Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Vermes in the 10th edition of Systema Naturae

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is ratedList-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconAnimalsLow‑importance
WikiProject iconVermes in the 10th edition of Systema Naturae is within the scope ofWikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related toanimals andzoology. For more information, visit theproject page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject AnimalsTo-do:


WikiProject iconHistory of ScienceLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of theHistory of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize thehistory of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit theproject page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to thediscussion. You can also help with theHistory of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconTree of LifeLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage oftaxonomy and thephylogenetictree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.

Unfair judgement

[edit]
"The class Vermes, as Linnaeus conceived it, was a rather diverse and mismatched grouping of animals; basically it served as a wastebasket taxon for any invertebrate species that was not an arthropod."

That remark is rather unfair. First, there was no theory of evolution in Linnaeus' days, so he couldn't have known whether or not these animals wererelated. Today we explain their superficial similarities by shared archaisms; Linnaeus, who must have implicitly assumed that all animals came about at roughly the same time, surely had no such notion. Second, the group may have been rather diverse, but think about how diverse the other classes were.Mammalia contained animals as seemingly unrelated as shrews, whales, and horses,Amphibia contained snakes, turtles, and frogs (which, of course, was also wrong, but that's not the point). All together, I think it's wrong to call Linnaeus' Vermes a wastebasket taxon, because he had grounded reasons to have it that way and did not do it for the sake of convenience.Steinbach (talk)11:34, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link onVermes in the 10th edition of Systema Naturae. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue orfailed to let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)19:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Vermes_in_the_10th_edition_of_Systema_Naturae&oldid=1205584280"
Categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp