| This article was nominated fordeletion on 30 November 2010 (UTC). The result ofthe discussion wasspeedy keep. |
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theVeneration of Mary in the Catholic Church article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
| Archives:1,2Auto-archiving period:2 months |
| This article iswritten inAmerican English, which has its own spelling conventions (center,color,defense,realize,traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from othervarieties of English. According to therelevant style guide, this should not be changed withoutbroad consensus. |
| This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at thenomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk)00:47, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The point in the lede abouthyperdulia is quite an important technical point about Marian veneration from a Catholic or Eastern perspective. I do not know why it should be removed. In fact the Protestant accusation of "Mariolatry" does kind of relate to this where we mentionlatria but without sources and a dispassionate discussion of the refutation, I don't see a need to include that. Secondly, perhaps someone should fact-check through this article. I just found the infobox claiming that "Catholics believe Mary didn't die..." false -- corrected. There may be worse stuff hanging around in here.Elizium23 (talk)05:49, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like the opening line of this article is suboptimal. I could be mistaken, but it seems to be a subjective judgement on Roman Catholicism rather than something becomint of an objective, detached article. Any thoughts?47.221.153.136 (talk)18:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Medusahead, I see you've begun modifying instances of "Pope N X issued apapal bull" to remove "papal" because of the tautology. I am not sure this is an error to be corrected, but let's discuss options. A "papal bull" is a common idiom and may be more recognizable to reader ship than simply writing "bull" which may also be misconstrued if unadorned. Would it also be an option to observeMOS:HON and remove "Pope" from the phrase instead? Then we could kill two MOS birds with one stone.Elizium23 (talk)09:23, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]