This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theUNRWA and Israel article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofpolitics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofsociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofIsrael on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographicPalestine region, thePalestinian people and theState of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visitingthe project page, where you can add your name to thelist of members where you can contribute to thediscussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofInternational relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below
You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of yourcommon.css page:
.ECR-edit-request-warning{display:none;}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request
You are not anextended-confirmed user, soyou must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make anedit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)
The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
All participants in formal discussions (RfCs,RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit.
You must be logged-in andextended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except formaking edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours (except inlimited circumstances)
According to the table below the image, the UK has resumed funding, leaving the US the only country with suspended funding.
Portugal appears in gray, but the article states that it even increased its funding.
While writing this, I saw that Portugal actually pledged 10 million Euros, putting it above the cut-off for the 2022 pledges (despite having a lower GDP than 1 country on the list, not counting with Palestine)Daniel.sousa.me (talk)10:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Selfstudier: I am lost in the details. Can the three last lede paragraphs be removed as they are not a summary of the body, as well as being already summarized in the third lede paragraph?Makeandtoss (talk)14:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Really needs sorting out the body first, then the lead will take care of itself (and finally, summarizing back in the parent/removing the duplicated material from there).Selfstudier (talk)14:16, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
True but the current situation isn't readable. I think the 4th and 5th lede paragraphs can be removed for now from the lede without affecting the overall summary. Useful bits can be later extracted from them in the future.Makeandtoss (talk)21:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, if you insist, then please do the summary of the new lead back at the main page and clean up the duplication (from when I copied all the UNRWA/Israel relations stuff over to here).Selfstudier (talk)22:05, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are redoing the lead here. Then summarize it and replace all the material in the main UNRWA article that I copied to here with the summary and this article as main. That was the whole point of the recent RM.Selfstudier (talk)23:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I removed the duplicated material from the parent that was copied here, when the lead is finalized here, it needs to be summarized and included at the main article (I have left what was there before pending that being done).Selfstudier (talk)10:53, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[1] Leaving this NYT article here; clearly articulates the 2024 controversy as: allegation of direct participation of 12, later expanded to reach 10% are involved; former allegation half disproved, later one unsubstantiated. Also mentions that UNRWA's creation was also due to push by Iraq and Egypt in 1951.Makeandtoss (talk)11:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At the end of the "Background" section, the text reads: "the specific allegation that 12 UNWRA employees were involved in the Hamas-led assault on Israel". It should be UNRWA, not UNWRA. Could someone please fix this? I lack the necessary permissions.Maxime182752 (talk)23:23, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
