| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theTokelau article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
| Archives:1 |
| This article iswritten inNew Zealand English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour,realise,analyse,centre,fiord) and some terms may be different or absent from othervarieties of English. According to therelevant style guide, this should not be changed withoutbroad consensus. |
| Tokelau received apeer review by Wikipedia editors, which is nowarchived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
| This It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Will mentionthis as referencing Tuvalu.Jackiespeel (talk)16:45, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This claim seems to originate from Joost Zuurbier, the entrepreneur who originally managed the .tk TLD and was intimately involved with its operation. According to the article[1] MIT which is cited in this page already, that GDP claim is disputed by Tokelauan officials73.203.44.14 (talk)19:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What happened in WWII? Or did it somehow ignore Tokelau and the Tokelauans? --Oneiros (talk)17:26, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All the GDP numbers seem to be nominal at current prices, NOT at Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) nor adjusted for inflation. I get this from reading the reference including the Excel file downloadable from that reference. I plan to revise the infobox to eliminate mention of PPP, etc. If you disagree, please explain how you got that from the source cited or from some other source. Thanks,DavidMCEddy (talk)00:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at thenomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk)18:25, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The current version of this article makes two claims that are apparently contradicting :
"45% of its residents had been born overseas, mostly in Samoa or New Zealand."This formulation suggests nearly half of the population are non-natives, which is likely to be understood as non-indigenous by any general reader.
" Approximately 94% of the population speak Tokelauan as their first language."This suggests nearly all residents are indigenous. Tokelauan is not your *first* language, if you have moved in from NZ or Samoa.
Both claims could be true only if mothers of 45% people choose to give birth in NZ hospitals - in which case it is irrelevant information creating unwanted misunderstanding - or if parents of this proportion of people reside(d) long term overseas, but were natives of Tokelau, in which case "though to Tokelauan parents".
I find it more likely, that an error occurred here and perhaps the second claim should read:"Of the remaining 55% that are indigenous 94% speak Tokelauan as their 1st lg."
Somebody ought to figure outYak-indolog (talk)00:44, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]