This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theTiny-house movement article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofArchitecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofUrban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning
A fact fromTiny-house movement appeared on Wikipedia'sMain Page in theDid you know column on 16 March 2009, and was viewed approximately 3,900 times (disclaimer). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article barely discusses the class aspect of this. Billionaires will still have more and more multiple homes and private yachts while the poor are expected to live in ever smaller single dwellings barely bigger than a dog kennel... All the while greenwashing the obvious economic/class issue. I'm not the only person to have spotted this, and it has been commented on in print, the article should reflect this.88.211.110.163 (talk)21:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A little bit late to the issue, but if you have any reliable sources I could refer to I'd be happy to comb through them and add the economic factors to the article. Can't simply create it out of thin air as perWP:Synthesis and I don't personally know where to begin looking for good sources on this "movement", unfortunatelyNyctomint (talk)17:45, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
