Talk:The Bengal Files
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theThe Bengal Files article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
Archives (index):1,2Auto-archiving period:28 days  |
 | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of yourcommon.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning{display:none;} Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related tothe region ofSouth Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, which issubject to theextended-confirmed restriction. You are not anextended-confirmed user, soyou must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make anedit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
| Warning: active arbitration remedies Thecontentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates tothe region ofSouth Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a contentious topic.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, any expectedstandards of behaviour, or anynormal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
Archives | ||
Index
| ||
This page has archives. Sections older than28 days may be auto-archived byLowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4. |
 | Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
2409:40E5:1167:9AC:74C2:DAFF:FEB8:A489 (talk)20:54, 22 September 2025 (UTC)Bengal files is truly based on real history.[reply]
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a"change X to Y" format and provide areliable source if appropriate.Nubzor[T][C]21:01, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply] | Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Remove word propaganda film It’s not propaganda2405:201:2000:D121:EC1F:98EF:B916:124D (talk)16:28, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now: please establish aconsensus for this alterationbefore using the
{{Edit extended-protected}} template.Day Creature (talk)17:14, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply] | Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Change propaganda film to social film . IT IS NOT A PROPAGANDA film , direct action fay was REALLL it is not some made up thing.49.204.224.79 (talk)04:35, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now: please establish aconsensus for this alterationbefore using the{{Edit extended-protected}} template. Persistent re-requesting may be considered disruptive. Best,GoldRomean (talk)04:56, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]WP:FILMLEAD is pretty clear on what the lead of a film article should look like, andWP:LABEL is pretty clear that intext attribution is pretty much always required contentious value-laden terms ("propaganda film" here). A pretty extraordinary consensus would be required to overturn this global norm for a specific article. We clearly don't have that here. As such, the contentious label needs to be removed from the lead. regards,TryKid [dubious –discuss]15:43, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]