Talk:Srinagar
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theSrinagar article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
| Archives:1,2Auto-archiving period:3 months |
| This It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article iswritten inIndian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour,travelled,centre,analysed,defence) and some terms may be different or absent from othervarieties of English. According to therelevant style guide, this should not be changed withoutbroad consensus. |
| The content ofSheikh Bagh Cemetery wasmerged intoSrinagar on October 2018. The former page'shistory now serves toprovide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see itstalk page. |

The caption belowFile:Meruvardhanaswami Temple, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India (1981).jpg says, "An 8th century Hindu temple at Pandrethan, in the vicinity of present-day Srinagar." The temple has anarch with akeystone; there's actually more than one. Are we sure this didn't have some post-British restoration (in the manner of theMahabodhi temple inBodhgaya)? A gothic arch in Kashmir that anticipated knowledge the Muslims brought after 1200 CE, I could have bought, but the keystone ... hmm ... is a stretch. As always, it is time foruser:Johnbod to weigh in.Fowler&fowler«Talk»13:46, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Why can't it be highlighted in the first lineYaverjavid (talk)04:34, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]