| This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Could someone find a picture of Spymaster with less terrible anatomy for the picture? It's a bit unseemly.—Precedingunsigned comment added by76.22.22.167 (talk)09:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Spymaster.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use inthis Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.
Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk)05:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It seems nobody can agree on this. This article contradicts itself, citingIron Man (Vol. 1) #254 in the infobox andIron Man (Vol. 3) #8 in the article. The character'sentry on the Comic Book Database citesIron Man (Vol. 1) #330. Just wondering if anyone knows of any other trusted sources that can be turned to for this.Sonam8311 (talk)21:42, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article is way too short with the publication history and fictional character biography not that well developed, they both should be expanded in more detail than what they currently have so far.--Paleface Jack (talk)16:02, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]