Talk:Soyuzmultfilm
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
On the one hand, there's "исполняющий обязанности директор киностудии "Союзмультфильм" Акоп Киракосян", and on the other there's "Руководитель государственного "Союзмультфильма" Эрнест Рахимов". Both fromthis website. And inthis interview, Akop is mentioned as director. Who's in charge of what?Esn12:32, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Bremenskie muzykanty.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use inthis Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.
Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot02:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Nu pogodi by vjacheslav kotenochkin.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use inthis Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.
Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk)15:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 | An image used in this article,File:Nu pogodi by vjacheslav kotenochkin.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason:Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please reviewdeletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk)10:04, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
Does anyone know which film was serialized in the U.S. (in the 1950s) as Tale of the Northern Lights?Gaohoyt (talk)19:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The top paragraph originally ended with the sentence
First question: as of when?
The source,
has 32 pages; pages 1–31 have 50 entries each, but p.32 has only 13. Most entries consist of a title and a year, like this:
but some are "empty", like this:
(The glyphs used as quotation marks are (left) ╚ U+255ABOX DRAWINGS DOUBLE UP AND RIGHT and (right) ╩ U+2569BOX DRAWINGS DOUBLE UP AND HORIZONTAL.)
The years are in chronological order. "The Magpies Gossip (2007)", line 28 of p.31, is the last line in the file to contain a title. The next line ("╚╩ (2008)") and all the rest of p.31, and all 13 lines on p.32 are "empty", with only a year. Therefore the source lists only films through 2007, although the years on the lines go through 2016.
Second question: how many?
Since only pp.1-30 have a full complement of 50 titles, p.31 has only 28, and p.32 has none, the source includes only30 * 50 + 28 = 1528 actual entries, not 1563. Pages 1–32 have 50 lines each (with and without titles) and p.33 has only 13 (all without), so there are31 * 50 + 13 = 1563 lines in all. This must be the source of the number 1563 at the top of p.1 for "All studio films", which is entered as a constant in the HTML, not computed:
.jpg)
.svg)
All studio films (1563) :The number 1530 that the article previously quoted was probably based on an editor's miscount of the titles on p.31.
I have added the timespan and corrected the count.
--Thnidu (talk)18:32, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links onSoyuzmultfilm. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)12:31, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk)18:53, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Why are there so many of them as of this writing?Espngeek (talk)00:27, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Are they deleted for some reasons?Espngeek (talk)00:31, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=link}