This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Former countries This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, pleasejoin the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country CroatiaMid‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofCroatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia Mid This article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.

The folk story of Tisimir (Tjesimir), Kresimir and Elem has no proof at all, and king Miroslav didn't have three mentioned sons. See Laušić, Ante: Postanak i razvitak poljičke kneževine (do kraja XV. stoljeća), Književni krug Split, Biblioteka znanstvenih djela, Split 1991. Of course, as a legend it is OK, but should not be cited as relevant.Plantago19:01, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seem clear that there were earlier redactions of the statute and that the one of 1440 was just the oldest one preserved. I'm not sure there's much knowledge or consensus about wheter the previous redactions where written or not, but the (poor) article on the poljica statute seems to suggest they were. I can't really check all the sources, but I would suggest rechecking them or some rewording.Personuser (talk)04:51, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Start-Class former country articles
• WikiProject Former countries articles
• Start-Class Croatia articles
• Mid-importance Croatia articles
• All WikiProject Croatia pages