Article(edit |visual edit |history) ·Article talk(edit |history) ·Watch

Reviewer:Dom497 (talk·contribs)14:40, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – seeWP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is itreasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B.MoS compliance forlead,layout,words to watch,fiction, andlists:

2. Is itfactually accurate andverifiable?

   A.References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C.No original research:

3. Is itbroad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is itneutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is itstable?

   Noedit wars, etc:

6. Does itcontainimages to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images aretagged with theircopyright status, andvalid fair use rationales are provided fornon-free content:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, withsuitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Pass!--Dom497 (talk)00:17, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing needs to be fixed.--Dom497 (talk)00:17, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]