Talk:Public inquiry
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This level-5 vital article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Given the recent beef scandal, this needs it's own page. The report has been put online, and the Larry Goodman page contains some detail.
Surely this article should mention the Arms for Iraq enquiry which seemed to drag on for even longer than most. Mention could also be made of the fact that the Government received the report several months - I think it was six - before the public, and the opposition received it six weeks before.
I surfed in tracing inquiries into cause(s) of aircraft crashes.
Similarly, official inquires both civil and military are often convened into disasters causing major loss of human life.
Stunningly enough, these inquiries occur worldwide, not just in Ireland. Either this article is misnamed, or you need to broaden its scope.
Georgejdorner (talk)18:08, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This page is dreadfully out of date in respect to the leveson inquiry.— Precedingunsigned comment added by81.151.117.73 (talk)23:22, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The dates given for the announcement and commencement appaer to be incorrect. Here in his opening remarks Brian Leveson says the inquiry was announced by Cameron in 13th Julyhttp://www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/about/opening-remarks/And here Chennel Four announced the beginning of the inquiry on the 14th November:http://www.channel4.com/news/leveson-inquiry-begins-into-press-ethicsThere have also been numerous briefing sessions and seminars between July and November.http://www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/news-and-events/I'm going to change the table to reflect this, if anyone can show evidence otherwise let me know.Kaleeyed (talk)17:16, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In the UK, isn't theIndependent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse a public inquiry?SethWhales talk19:20, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done TheIICSA has been added to the table in the newly branched-off articlePublic inquiries in the United Kingdom.SpookiePuppy (talk)01:33, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]On 22 July 2022, a large section of this article, some 17,397 bytes, was removed from this article along with the subheading "List of some public inquiries in the UK", references and notes. The text was removed byUser:DeFacto who gave the following reasons in the edit summary: "perWP:UNDUE in this general and global context article, and unsourced as a notable list anyway." The deleted section included a lengthy list of inquiries within the UK. A quick count of the editing history suggests that well over 30 different editors have contributed to the material. Another concern is that this list may contain the sole or minimal mention of certain inquiries on the entirety of the English Wikipedia, so removing the list outright, could serve to disappear or reduce any encyclopaedic reference to these inquiries. So rather than reverting the edit, I have taken the opportunity to branch off the material that related to the United Kingdom into its own dedicated articlePublic inquiries in the United Kingdom where the global context should no longer be a concern. The issue of the list being "unsourced as a notable list" will have to be dealt with separately as we try to tighten up the referencing.SpookiePuppy (talk)20:00, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
