Talk:Past
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This level-4 vital article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This page wasproposed for deletion byIncompleteBits (talk ·contribs) on 6 November 2021 with the comment: This article is redundant withGrammatical tense, many of the articles linked to in thefields of study section (most notablyMemory), and should be redundant with (but does not mention the scientific uncertainty about the existence of the past which results from uncertainty about the)Arrow of time. It wascontested byRunningTiger123 (talk ·contribs) on 6 November 2021 with the comment: The "past" is a notable topic, so deleting it wholesale is probably not the right move. At the very least, an AfD would allow more thorough consideration of alternatives, such as redirects and merges. |
 | This article was selected as thearticle for improvement on 6 September 2021 for a period of one week. |
Is the only difference between future and past is that we can remember past, but cannot remember future?93.178.119.100 (talk)19:25, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Has a lot of bells and whistles, but still a Stub in terms of content.
Want to help write or improve articles about Time? JoinWikiProject Time or visit theTime Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara✉ 19:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)drunk. want . more. past lives better ?—Precedingunsigned comment added by213.191.241.246 (talk)01:57, 7 August 2010 (UTC) The past never proceeds yet u can go ahead skake it dont break iT do u remember how u got here[reply]
Anonymous— Precedingunsigned comment added by50.137.78.1 (talk)05:01, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm. How do we know that the past exists? In reality, the past is just the present that is no more, so how can it be if it no longer is?
The past is just a construct in our minds. Hence it is always changing as we rebuild it with every new experience
The past is a mind category that we use and a thing that doesn't quite exist as a tangible thing but it exists nonetheless, it's just that humans are time constrained in the time continuum. And we don't change the past, we think we do, put what we change is ourimpression of the past. Not the past itself.--Rodrigo Cornejo01:32, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The past is not only mind category, but also a physical one. What scientific source does deny thephysical existence of the Past?гык11:10, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't we include the past-related things into their category?
– or rather, their categories should be included, if they exist.
Also:memory,retro,antiquarian,fossil,history.
Adam7800:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is it alright to call past the "opposite of future"?59.184.252.69 (talk)18:43, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We have prepared a new "light cone" image. The intention was to imply the correct scale of space-time relative to the observer. Interstellar light-years vs years scales seemed appropriate. If you have any comments please post them atthe Graphics Lab entry.Dhatfield (talk)22:37, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The memories of j.k.rowling is what she left and did not include her past but only memories i think she should have so we can remember her for rememberance also so we can change the better and have the better in projects about her—Precedingunsigned comment added by68.158.6.106 (talk)23:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The article says that the past is an important topic of study in fields such as..and then includes "memory" in the list. I was unaware memory is a field of study (the psychology of memory is).Vorbee (talk)19:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
