| This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Although the MIA is ranked as 21,162 according toAlexa I still think that as a specialized website it is important enough to start an article on it.—Precedingunsigned comment added by145.94.41.95 (talk)20:01, 5 February 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Today I added the main outline with enough information in each section to keep it interesting. I still have to figure out the references, I want them numbered external links; anyone know how to do that?—Precedingunsigned comment added by130.161.31.18 (talk)18:23, 7 February 2005 (UTC)[reply]
how are "Lenin, Trotsky, Rosa Luxemburg and Che Guevara" the main writers after Marx and Engles? what aboutAntonio Gramsci,Georg Lukács andLev Vygotsky?—Precedingunsigned comment added byMonty Cantsin (talk)00:30, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm a member of the MIA. The stars indicate those writers that are most "popular" in the English-language Section, based on hits and search requests. -- Juan (11/XII/2005)—Precedingunsigned comment added by67.101.45.119 (talk)08:36, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The article says, "....in 1990 when a worker - known only by his Internet nickname, Zodiac - started archiving...." Does that mean "known only" in the sense that the authors of this article don't know him, or did he indicate that he wishes to remain anonymous? (We can simply ask him, of course.) I had assumed that others knew that he's the individual whose initials are K.K.C., and I think he deserves the credit in the form of his name being remembered honorably in the history of world literture.Mike Lepore, Stanfordville, New York06:02, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Mike, long time, yes? In fact "Zodiac" asked to remain anonymous in this way, even though you and I know who is since we both worked with him on the old MEIA back in 1994 and 1995. He does deserve credit for the person "who started it all" in a sense, but thats the way he wants to keep it. A person from the MIA visited him to clear all this up.DavidMIA06:29, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The section of the article on the division of the archive is now out of date, as there has been a major reorganisation eliminating the binary classification into Marxists and non-Marxsts. Most importantly, this involved the merging of the "Marxist Writers" and the "Reference Section" to create a listing simply called"Library" and the creation of a short heterogeneous list called"Selected Marxist Writers" to provide a guide to newer users of where they could start if they want to study Marxism. However, since I work on MIA I don't think it's appropriate that I should revise this section of the article. --Mia-etol (talk)06:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The image shows a mirror located in Nevada, but the caption and website say it's in Utah.75.67.247.122 (talk)06:00, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
MIA is the largest digital publisher of Marxist works in the world. It is absolutely absurd and patently an attempt at political hit to flag this page for potential removal on "notability" grounds. For shame!!!Carrite (talk)22:23, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links onMarxists Internet Archive. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
YAn editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)08:07, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links onMarxists Internet Archive. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
YAn editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)05:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
TheFAQ cites annual visitor stats. Is it worth including these self-reported numbers? Could work well as a table.