This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theMI5 article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text.Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome!Learn to edit;get help. Assume good faith Be polite andavoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seekdispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL

Archives:1Auto-archiving period:12 months

This article iswritten inBritish English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour,travelled,centre,defence,artefact,analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from othervarieties of English. According to therelevant style guide, this should not be changed withoutbroad consensus.

This level-5 vital article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

EspionageTop‑importance MI5 is within the scope ofWikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage ofespionage,intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit theproject page, or contribute to thediscussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage Top This article has been rated asTop-importance on theproject's importance scale. Politics of the United KingdomTop‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofPolitics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom Top This article has been rated asTop-importance on theproject's importance scale. Military history:Culture /Intelligence /British /European /World War I /World War II /Cold War /Post-Cold War This article is within the scope of theMilitary history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see alist of open tasks. To use this banner, please see thefull instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history This article has been checked against the followingcriteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation:criterion met Coverage and accuracy:criterion met Structure:criterion met Grammar and style:criterion met Supporting materials:criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force Intelligence task force British military history task force European military history task force World War I task force World War II task force Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989) Post-Cold War task force LondonHigh‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofLondon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related High This article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Topics inactive for365 days are automatically archived1 or more at a time byLowercase sigmabot III if there are more than5.

Something like this should be said - that there was an utterly ridiculous situation for decades that even James Bond films about MI5 were being routinely made every 2 years etc, but the British govt still always refused to officially acknowledge that MI5 even existed (until 1992/3). The Stella Rimington article does say that she was the first MI5 leader acknowledged by the govt -https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stella_Rimington— Precedingunsigned comment added by82.16.72.221 (talk)22:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As a point of accuracy, James Bond is part of MI6, not MI5.Dferstat (talk)12:02, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Should the MI5/SS logo be mentioned in this article? I believe it is pre-1955 but have also read that it was used from the 1950's to 1970's. Any more information on this?— Precedingunsigned comment added by77.96.24.33 (talk •contribs) 21:42, 21 January 2009

After reading the recent BBC piece "How MI5 piled falsehood on falsehood in the case of neo-Nazi spy who abused women," I'm wondering if maybe there should be a "controversies" section on this page. That seems to be a standard practice for other large institutions, so I'm surprised that there's not one here. Anyone want to take a shot at it?

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3w4nwdwywnoDrabconcert (talk)20:45, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please seeWP:CSECTION. "Avoid sections and articles focusing on criticisms or controversies". I have recently spent quite a bit of time dismantling "controversy sections" on articles such asRio Tinto andBHP, among others.Dormskirk (talk)22:34, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirectThe Security Service has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 27 § The Security Service until a consensus is reached.GnocchiFan (talk)13:59, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've just had my first read of this article, and found several things I see as problems.

Oversight

Of the four sentences in this section, only the first actually discusses anything like the topic; even then, it just blandly states that staff are bound by the Official Secrets Act. There's no mention of what, if any, bodies actually have any oversight over MI5.

The next two sentences discuss the scope of MI5's activities, while the last names the current head. These are nothing to do with oversight.

Sentence 2 is also duplicated below under Participation of MI5 officers in criminal activity.

Early years

The last paragraph confuses me. It starts off "In 2006, his article ... ". Who's being referred to here? Then someone called Hiley "objected to the retelling of the story". Who is this person, and what is their significance? Which story? The preceding paragraph? And why did they object? Without context, the objections are meaningless.

Inter-war period

Paragraph 1, sentence 2 actually discusses MI5 during WWI, as does the entire para 2. I suggest joining this content with the last 2 paras of the previous section, Early years, into a new WW1 section.

Given that, according to this article, MI5 did not operate in Ireland during the war of independence, I query the inclusion of most of the content in this section. If MI5 had no part in the conflict, this content should be on a different page, not this one.

I'd be grateful if a subject matter expert, or two, would have a look at these.Dferstat (talk)12:54, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to sort the bit on "early years". In my view, duplication of the bit about "Participation of MI5 officers in criminal activity" is justified because the sections are quite far apart. I express no view on the other points.Dormskirk (talk)13:41, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for shedding a bit more light on Hiley.

Yes, a large distance between the mentions of criminal activity might justify the repetition. Well, it would, if it had any relevance to Oversight, and I can't see any. Oversight refers to external bodies being able to monitor and report on breaches of an organisation's duties and responsibilities, which is not what the text in question is about.Dferstat (talk)15:10, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've given the Organisation section a pass. I've removed the duplicate, irrelevant material. I've moved around some content into more appropriate sub-headings, and done some re-formatting for readability. (Very long sentences should be avoided.)

I'd like to know what people think of this.Dferstat (talk)15:43, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've now had a go at the WW1 issue. I've moved relevant material from Early Years and Inter-war period into a new First World War section.

I've also slightly edited the para on Hiley to point out that he disputes official accounts.

I haven't attempted at the Irish War of Independence material, because that's going to require close reference to another page. I'd really be happier if someone more familiar with that topic could comment here.Dferstat (talk)23:24, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a look at the "Inter-war period" section, and I think I know what needs to go.

The 1st paragraph is fine, discussing MI5.

The second paragraph also, mostly, deals with MI5. However, the last sentence, detailing the allocation of the officers trained by MI5, is not relevant, it seems, because by this point these officers had no further involvement with MI5.

The next 4 paragraphs, from "In April 1919, Colonel Walter Wilson ..." through to "... D Branch thrived under Boyle's leadership" again have no connection to MI5, and should go.

The remaining 2 paragraphs are, however, connected to MI5, even if this connection doesn't appear until the end of the paragraph starting "In 1921, Sir Warren Fisher ...".

Other changes I would make would be to change the paragraph 2 reference to the "Anglo-Irish War" to "Irish War of Independence". The existing reference to "Irish War of Independence" I would change to simply "conflict".

In the last paragraph, I would change "MI5's efficiency in counter-espionage declined from the 1930s" to "MI5's efficiency in counter-espionage declined IN the 1930s". The section on WWII shows that MI5 was effective during the war, so any downturn in the 1930s must have been only temporary.

Comments are welcome.Dferstat (talk)04:44, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've now made these changes. I've added some more links, removed a redundant link, and added some minor re-wording.Dferstat (talk)08:56, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia articles that use British English
• B-Class level-5 vital articles
• Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
• B-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
• B-Class Espionage articles
• Top-importance Espionage articles
• B-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
• Top-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
• B-Class military history articles
• B-Class military culture, traditions, and heraldry articles
• Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force articles
• B-Class intelligence articles
• Intelligence task force articles
• B-Class British military history articles
• British military history task force articles
• B-Class European military history articles
• European military history task force articles
• B-Class World War I articles
• World War I task force articles
• B-Class World War II articles
• World War II task force articles
• B-Class Cold War articles
• Cold War task force articles
• B-Class Post-Cold War articles
• Post-Cold War task force articles
• B-Class London-related articles
• High-importance London-related articles

• All Wikipedia vital articles
• Pages with missing files