This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Football:EnglandMid‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofAssociation football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball Mid This article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale. This article is supported bythe English football task force (assessed asMid-importance). BedfordshireLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Bedfordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofBedfordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.BedfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject BedfordshireTemplate:WikiProject BedfordshireBedfordshire Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. Hertfordshire (inactive) This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Hertfordshire, a project which is currently considered to beinactive.HertfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject HertfordshireTemplate:WikiProject HertfordshireHertfordshire

I've thought about this long and hard (given that Idefinitely have a conflict of interest here). But I eventually came to the conclusion that the Football League Trophy had to be removed. Otherwise, we would surely have to include the respective club's second, third and fourth division achievements, total number of league titles, probably the third division south cup... it would just start getting ridiculous.WFC (talk)01:25, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I originally had it in there on the proviso that "both teams had entered it", but on reflection I think you're probably right for the reasons that you have given. Off it comes. –Cliftonian^{the orangey bit}06:38, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm happy enough for it to be mentioned in the prose though. While us Hornets knock it, it's probably one of the four or five most significant things to happen this century (along withthat League Cup encounter, the draw that got us into the playoffs, and said playoffs themselves).WFC (talk)14:10, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But does it really have anything to do with the rivalry? I say leave it out: as I see it, it isn't really relevant apart from as part of a table of honours. –Cliftonian^{the orangey bit}14:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I'm not going to complain ;)WFC (talk)15:15, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links onLuton Town F.C.–Watford F.C. rivalry. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20131020074918/http://www.footballfanscensus.com/issueresults/Club_Rivalries_Uncovered_Results.pdf tohttp://www.footballfanscensus.com/issueresults/Club_Rivalries_Uncovered_Results.pdf
• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20080529205257/http://www.fchd.info/LUTONT.HTM tohttp://www.fchd.info/LUTONT.HTM

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)01:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• C-Class football articles
• Mid-importance football articles
• C-Class football in England articles
• Mid-importance football in England articles
• Football in England task force articles
• WikiProject Football articles
• C-Class Bedfordshire articles
• Low-importance Bedfordshire articles