This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Italy This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofItaly on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly ??? This article has not yet received a rating on theproject's importance scale. Politics:Political partiesLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofpolitics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. This article is supported byPolitical parties task force (assessed asLow-importance). Socialism This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofsocialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism ??? This article has not yet received a rating on theproject's importance scale.

To Tazmaniacs:

according to Italian law, any newspaper has to have a "responsible editor", i.e. a professional journalist (inscribed in the "Albo dei giornalisti")who takes legal responsibility for what's written in the newspaper.

In early days, since no one of the people writing on "Lotta Continua" at the time was a professional reporter, there was the practice that "intellectuals" from the left -but not only- (such as e.g. Pio Baldelli and PP Pasolini), who were inscribed in the "Albo dei giornalisti" would "lend their name" so that the newspaper could be published.

Pasolini was very far from sharing "Lotta Continua's" political positions. In those years, he was close to the PCI, and expressed his views mostly on the "Corriere della Sera". It is not appropriate to list him as an "editor" without explaining this particular situation.Giordaano13:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pannella was never connected with Lotta Continua. Marco history came from liberal right, Lotta Continua was a marxist movement. See please Lotta Continua e Marco Pannella on it.wikipedia.org.pardon my bad english. I wrote one year and a half for a little newspaper in Verona, e learned a bit. Giordano is clear for the position of the responsible editor in front of the law. Porno magazine used to have a journalist acting as "responsible editor" for money. They never worked in those magazines but were paid for the risks. --Borgolibero (talk)01:41, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Lotta Continua (the struggle continues, or continuous struggle) ..."

I'm a native speaker of Italian. "Lotta continua" can only mean "continuous struggle". "Continua" can't be a verb, here: "the struggle continues" would be "LA lotta continua", with the definite article before the noun "lotta". I've corrected the text accordingly.151.46.186.73 (talk)00:55, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lotta Continua is described in the lead as a "terrorist organization"; but reading the article it seems to has been a legal and open organization.MiguelMadeira (talk)11:33, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Start-Class Italy articles
• Unknown-importance Italy articles
• All WikiProject Italy pages
• Start-Class politics articles
• Low-importance politics articles
• Start-Class political party articles
• Low-importance political party articles
• Political parties task force articles
• WikiProject Politics articles
• Start-Class socialism articles
• Unknown-importance socialism articles
• WikiProject Socialism articles