Talk:Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theLockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
| Archives:1,2 |
 | This page isnot a forum for general discussion aboutLockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel. Any such commentsmay be removed orrefactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions aboutLockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel at theReference desk. |
 | A fact fromLockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel appeared on Wikipedia'sMain Page in theDid you know column on 11 December 2009. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel has been listed as one of theWarfare good articles under thegood article criteria. If you can improve it further,please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you canreassess it. Review: March 22, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is ratedGA-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As part of the classified document leak in early 2023, although authenticity of some documents are questionable.https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/rq-170-sentinel-stealth-drones-may-have-flown-sorties-off-crimeaMemelephant (talk)09:33, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The caption for the image "RQ-170 in Iran.jpg" says the image is of an Iranian-built copy of the RQ-170, but the description of the file in Wikimedia Commons says the image is of the drone that Iran downed and captured, not a copy that they built. Should probably verify which is correct and change whichever is incorrect, either the caption or the file's description.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RQ-170_in_Iran.jpg32.221.113.244 (talk)00:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It seems new information about the size of the drone has been accepted in the Specification section which contradicts the assessment(s) mentioned in the Design section.Perhaps it could be mentioned in the Design section, that the assessed measurements are outdated. Or a larger edit could be made.I’m somewhat rusty with regards to editing, so for now I’ll leave it to others.Bhj dk (talk)09:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
