Talk:Little Nemo
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This level-5 vital article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Will work some more on this later. Will also addWinsor McCay article. Also, I heard that Little Nemo is now outside copyright. Is true? and if so, how can I get pictures onto this page? McCay's artwork is amazing! -Asa
that is, all countries in which a device routes the packets that transmit the work.I'm not a lawyer, but that's how I interpret theWIPO Copyright Treaty.
but still under copyright in the European Union, where copyright term extensions tend to restore copyright topublic domain works.Given that the last surviving author died in 1934, the strips fall into PD at the end of 1934 + 70 = 2004. --Damian Yerrick
The 1992 feature film was also released in the US in english (I have a copy) -Will Saxe
There's a mistake in the author's birth of date. He wasn't born in 1887, as the article says, but in 1867, 1869 or 1871 (the real date isn't certain). He wasn't 18 when he created Little Nemo. Please change this date.
This article is not clear, completely confusing, bad structure, bad images. See thefrench article in comparison, and seecommons images about Little Nemo.CB00102:11, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In the introduction to the Taschen-collection of Little Nemo, Bill Blackbeard writes about the popularity of the comic strip among American kids: "They wanted none of it". So why does film historian Charles Musser, on Kino's dvd-box 'The Movies Begin', mention that it was "immensely popular"? Why was there an operetta based on the comic, made by the famous Victor Herbert? Why was an animated film released in 1911? Why were thousands of children welcoming Nemo during his 1911 tour of America (in the comic)?Mwvandersteen11:35, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This movie doesn't appear to have any connection to the comic other than a vague passing reference. The cast as listed on IMDB include none of the characters most central to the comic (Dr Pill, Flip, or the Princess).-Alex12:50, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I like this article. For the most part, the facts seem to check out and register with what little I know about the strip. However, I still think it needs some sources. As it is, it reads a little like a review from "Comics Journal" (which make a lot of "upitty" judgements, in my opinion). For example, the article says:
"The strip was not a great popular success in its time. Most readers preferred the slapstick antics of such strips as Katzenjammer Kids, Happy Hooligan and Buster Brown to the surreal fantasy of Nemo, and other comic strips like Krazy Kat. However, during the late 20th century and early 21st century, the strip received more recognition."
Yeah, I know that the Fantagraphics crowd is in love with Krazy Kat and Little Nemo right now, but this paragraph makes the other comics sound like drivel. Krazy Kat had plenty of slapstick fun, whether "upitty" judgementalists think so or not. Maybe I'm just being sensitive.Mvblair15:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
MyFantagraphics volumes have different ISBN numbers on the dustcover than on the Library of Congress page. And sometimes, neither of those numbers work on online searches. I added ISBN numbers that seem to work.NWeber (talk)17:41, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Consider adding a link to theComic Strip Library, a site that contains many scans of Little Nemo strips (and eventually the whole run, minus the brief revival which isn't in the public domain in the US). It is my own site, so a conflict of interest keeps me from adding it myself. Thanks. --Zpc (talk)05:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Any pictures of Sprite as apparently he inspired Hobbes of Calvin and Hobbes fame.--81.101.3.9 (talk)19:37, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given atWikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contactthe Comics WikiProject.Comics-awb (talk)16:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please correct these dates in the opening paragraph. Little Nemo in Slumberland ran Oct 15, 1905 to July 23, 1911. In the Land of Wonderful Dreams ran Sept 3, 1911 to July 26, 1914.—Precedingunsigned comment added by69.134.66.68 (talk) 13:58, 1 December 2008
This article implies that Little Nemo ran concurrently with Krazy Kat, which in fact began in 1916, two years after the strip ended.—Precedingunsigned comment added bySchrodingers rabbit (talk •contribs)01:11, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There are two references to Google's "Doodle" adaptation of Little Nemo under "Adaptations" and "Cultural Influence." Isn't only one sufficient? Which one should remain?Remi (talk)07:44, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There's adiscussion on which comic-related articles should be listed as "Top Importance" on the importance scale, and I feel this article should not be included. If any user disagrees or wishes to contribute, please do so there.Argento Surfer (talk)14:44, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article's a horrible mess. I've been doing a lot of work on other McCay articles. I plan on getting to this one eventually—I do have more than enough sources—but "eventually" could be next year.Curly Turkey (gobble)06:16, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Restoration work took Maresca five to twenty hours per page"
Piece of cake, really. Many comics restorations works need whole days, and sometimes weeks.— Precedingunsigned comment added by78.229.6.141 (talk)22:58, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know thatFile:Little Nemo 1907-09-29.jpg will be appearing aspicture of the day on August 26, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb atTemplate:POTD/2016-08-26. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on theMain Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk)10:54, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onLittle Nemo. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)10:03, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at thenomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk)11:52, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This article is ostensibly about the character of Little Nemo (as the opening indicates), but is, in fact, about the strip which carries his name.98.13.3.175 (talk)19:25, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
