This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofmagazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofjournalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofFrance on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
L'Express has written several in-depth series of articles about the Freemasons, it seems only logical to conclude that relations exist between the secret associations and the newspaper.[1][2]ADM (talk)19:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of the proposal.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal wasmoved. There's not necessarily consensus here either way, but with this as an established primary topic, it should've been at the base title anyway, and discussions should've taken place from that starting point. --BDD (talk)15:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Le Vif/L'Express, a French language weekly news magazine published in Brussels, Belgium
Inclined toOppose - whether L'Express should redirect to the magazine or the dab, there are multiple regional subjects, removing (France) isn't helping mobile readers.In ictu oculi (talk)23:52, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Unless there is a logical argument that the undisambiguated term should not be directing to here, as it currently is, our disamniguation guidelines mean that the parentheses are not needed and should be removed.--Yaksar(let's chat)03:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support perWP:PTOPIC, clear primary topic, none of the items listed above (and most of them are just partial title matches) is remotely comparable in terms of available sources or notability with the French magazine.Cavarrone22:10, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
I have just modified one external link onL'Express. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.
