This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

India:Cities /HistoryLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage ofIndia-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit theproject page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. This article is supported byWikiProject Indian cities. This article is supported bythe Indian history workgroup (assessed asLow-importance). This article was last assessed in May 2012. BuddhismLow‑importance This article falls within the scope ofWikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing withBuddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit theproject page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. Cities This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcities,towns and various othersettlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

A fact fromKosambi appeared on Wikipedia'sMain Page in theDid you know column on 2 April 2007. The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... thatKosambi, a city inancient India which was a frequent site of sermons by theBuddha, was one of the places considered suitable for hisParinibbāna? A record of the entry may be seen atWikipedia:Recent additions/2007/April.

Content is adapted from Pali Dictionary of Proper Names, which is in Public Domain.Greetings,Sacca11:28, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links onKosambi. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20110604160714/http://www.dailynews.lk/2007/12/05/fea06.asp tohttp://www.dailynews.lk/2007/12/05/fea06.asp
• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20160513183352/http://kaushambhi.nic.in/ tohttp://kaushambhi.nic.in/
• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20160513183352/http://kaushambhi.nic.in/ tohttp://kaushambhi.nic.in/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)11:56, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Kausambi coin 9th Century BC.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at thenomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk)06:37, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit confused as to how exactly the date "6th century BCE" was sourced. As it is, if this monastery really dates to the early Mahajanapada era it would be quite a significant site considering that the only other surviving monastery from the era, Jivakarama Vihara, is far less expansive than the image included in the article for Ghoshitaram.

• B-Class India articles
• Low-importance India articles
• B-Class India articles of Low-importance
• B-Class Indian cities articles
• Unknown-importance Indian cities articles
• B-Class Indian cities articles of Unknown-importance
• WikiProject Indian cities articles
• B-Class Indian history articles
• Low-importance Indian history articles
• B-Class Indian history articles of Low-importance
• WikiProject Indian history articles
• WikiProject India articles
• B-Class Buddhism articles
• Low-importance Buddhism articles
• B-Class WikiProject Cities articles
• All WikiProject Cities pages
• Wikipedia Did you know articles

• Talk pages with comments before the first section