![]() | This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image:KVOS3.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use inthis Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.
Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot04:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:KVOS2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use inthis Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.
Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot04:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It Appears that Comcast cable in Seattle is now carrying KVOS on cable channel 72. This is the first time in twenty years. Here's thelink from KVOS's website with the listing.Csworldwide1 (talk)15:51, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article says
That location is well beyond 15 miles of Bellingham. What is this part of the article really supposed to say?
Atomota (talk)02:51, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links onKVOS-TV. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)23:23, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onKVOS-TV. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)19:02, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Folks:
I am a Bellingham, Washington TV producer for Access Bellingham Television. I have recently done a video documentary on the demise of the KVOS TV Studios in Bellingham. Some of my information came from this article on KVOS TV.
I got some very strong pushback on the sentence in the article stating:
"In the early 1990s, due to Federal Communications Commission syndicated exclusivity rules affecting the Seattle media market, KVOS was dropped from most Seattle cable television systems."
This sentence was after discussion of Canadian Cable channels removing KVOS from their lineups.
The people that I talked with here in Bellingham told me it made sense that the Canadians would remove KVOS from their Cable lineups because their own offerings were being enhanced and they would want their own sources on their cable systems. However, it makes no sense that the FCC would want KVOS TV, a United States TV station removed from cable systems in Seattle, which is in the United States.
Looking carefully, I see no sourcing for this sentence about the FCC ordering Seattle cable to remove KVOS TV.
I am do a new video about KVOS and I intend to leave this non-sourced statement out and I intend to remove that sentence from the article if I do not get sourced feedback from this comment.
Thank you
Respectfully Yours
Mark Allyn
Bellingham, Washington
Allyn (talk)02:49, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Reference #3 has a misspelling of the word two as shown to the link it says "tow". I was unable to edit, moderator editing requested.66.235.37.8 (talk)10:12, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article makes mention of the fact that Univision's domestic schedule will be available in the Canadian markets that carry KVOS. This is actually incorrect. Canadian cable operators (namely Rogers/Shaw) carry the third sub channel which is METV programming. The CRTC allowed this a few years ago.Bigoranget (talk)18:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]