Movatterモバイル変換

Talk:ISDB-T International

Page contents not supported in other languages.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles abouttelevision programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you canjoin the discussion.To improve this article, please refer to thestyle guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
???	This article has not yet received a rating on theproject's importance scale.

Telecommunications

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofTelecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications
???	This article has not yet received a rating on theproject's importance scale.

The standard is called ISDB-Tb or "ISDB-T International"

[edit]

It is called "SBTVD" only internally in Brazil. Nobody outside Brazil calls it SBTVD. They call it either "ISDB-Tb" or "ISDB International" (see dibeg.org, the Japanese organization that handles the ISDB-T standard).

SBTVD is only used by Brazilians due to their giant ego trips.

If there´s a change, then the content from SBTVD should be merged INTO the ISDB-Tb entry.

I´m a tech journalist and I´ve read the DIBEG reports and spoken to them.I know what I am writing about.Fcassia (talk)—Precedingundated comment added09:27, 24 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

proof for Venezuela adopting SBTVD

[edit]

Where's the proof for Venezuela adopting SBTVD? --70.20.1.113 (talk)02:59, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No proofs.Fasouzafreitas (talk)14:58, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go.Artemis3 (talk)22:16, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT Merge the article

[edit]

The following discussion is closed.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

After over three years of supposedly open discussion, there is no consensus to merge.WTF? (talk)01:16, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's no doubt thatSBTVD is a standard that derived greatly fromISDB. However, there are many significant differences beyond video and audio compression standards that make the Brazilian version unique. For instance,

The emission masks of transmitters inSBTVD are specially adapted in order to comply with more adverse scenarios for interference from other stations. This is important for implementation purposes in many countries where the spectrum is congested.
Multiplexing and data structures and signaling were adapted to western standards, with the inclusion of character sets for Latin derived languages.
Middleware platforms are significantly more advanced in the Brazilian standards than its Japanese counterpart, with a actual implementation of declarative and procedural environments that expand the capacities of the entire system to whole new levels.
Copy protection measures (DRM) adopted in the Japanese standard are more strict than theSBTVD standards. The Japanese useB-CAS conditional access that scramble transmission over the air, while the Brazilian transmission is open for reception.
There are around 16 technical documents in the SBTVD alone , with over 3.000 pages published byABNT andSBTVD Forum, the Brazilian parties responsible for the documents. It's a complete standard on its own, produced by a different regulatory agency addressing different issues for a particular environment. The ISDB standard has its own technical standards published byARIB andDiBEG in Japan.

There are many other sound reasons not to merge the two systems. I'll submit some contributions that might address this further in the near future.--Alexandre Infante de Castro 22:32, 7 May 2009 (UTC)Infante (talk)

Additionally, The arcticle didn't state that Venezuela will adopt ISDB-T/SBTVD, but only points the country is analyzing the system (experimental).—Precedingunsigned comment added bySbtvdisdbt (talk •contribs)15:42, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

SBT

[edit]

Am I the only one who noticed that Silvio Santos' channel, SBT - Sistema Brasileiro de Televisão, has the same name (since Silvio's youth, LOOOOOONG ago) of the under implementation digital signal??? Other broadcasters wouldn't allow that... Unless of course the whole thing be funded by SBT... It's just a stupid name, making it the same of some known channel would greatly affect the market, and the government or the developers wouldn't do it without reason ($$$)... Or am I missing something?Ok that SBT is not a real name, it's just like "Brazil Textile Company", and if the gov makes a textile company they could name it like that even tough I alredy named mine textile co by that name, but the gov wouldn't do it, they'd call theirs the "Textiles from Brazil Company" or just any other stupid change only to avoid confusion... Dunno if I made myself clear because I'm copmpletely confused over it!—Precedingunsigned comment added by189.5.137.74 (talk)04:05, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be concerned about similarity between SBT Television Network name and Brazilian DTV standard name

[edit]

Although it is true that the name of Brazilian DTV standard - SBTVD - recalls the name of one of Brazilian television network - SBT - that really means nothing. The name SBTVD was choosen by Government members during the composition of the Presidential Act that created the study group to implement DTV in Brazil, and there is no relationship with SBT TV Network. The standard was created by Brazil Government and SBT does not have any relationship with its creation.The standard is a Brazil property and its name is a Government decision and no private company can complain about it, so other Brazilian TV Networks can't complain and actually they are not complaining at all. Another point to consider is that SBTVD is used basically by technical comunity and not by general population, that refers to digital TV like DTV or simply "digital TV system".—Precedingunsigned comment added bySbtvdisdbt (talk •contribs)23:12, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Terrible Grammar

[edit]

The grammar and punctuation in this article is terrible. It needs to be read carefully and revised multiple times by native English-speakers. (ie. the second paragraph was one sentence 5 lines long when I first read it)99.225.106.226 (talk)17:26, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For sure any help from native English-speakers in reviewing the arcticle is wellcome.

Philippines do not use ISDB-Tb.

[edit]

Philippines is still testing the ISDB-T, and there is a possibility that the country may create their own version of the format.So it is still hard to say if we will be the same with South America.— Precedingunsigned comment added by112.204.135.89 (talk)16:36, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MERGE PROPOSAL

[edit]

Hi everyone,I think we should merge this article withISDB-Tb, or redirect that one to this. What do you think?Thanks!Zalunardo8 (talk)15:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Data

[edit]

Hi all,The article says 94% of the households in Brazil have at least one TV set. Anyone can verify this with a reliable source? I found this article dated December 2012 that says (in Portuguese) that 95.1% of Brazilian households have at least one TV set. Can I change this on the article? Thanks!Zalunardo8 (talk)11:07, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Multiprogram Feature - Innovative service?

[edit]

One of the aspects covered on the article is related to the multi program feature and how innovative it is. Now, this is not a particular characteristic of the standard nor innovative at all.Does it make sense to keep this section ?Tafinho (talk)12:08, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links onISDB-T International. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If necessary, add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online}02:18, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links onISDB-T International. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If necessary, add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue orfailed to let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online}18:34, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links onISDB-T International. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)02:12, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links onISDB-T International. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)19:52, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links onISDB-T International. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)10:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]