Skip to table of contents |
This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theIDisk article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
![]() | This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image:Apple iDisk Icon.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.
Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot19:50, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
.mac is often criticized to be slow and expensive—Precedingunsigned comment added byMnml (talk •contribs) 10:16, August 8, 2007
True, but this article is only about the iDisk, not about .Mac (now MobileMe) in general.Photographerguy (talk)00:18, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Many people are critical of iDisk specifically because it's never been very fast even as Internet speeds have improved and iTools/.Mac/MobileMe have been updated. Trying to find a sourced criticism of that but I can say from experience that it's a fairly widely-held belief among the Mac community, even among those who generally like MobileMe.—Precedingunsigned comment added by199.86.26.15 (talk)19:30, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]