![]() | This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of theHum Europe page weremerged intoHum Network on 1 August 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please seeits history; for the discussion at that location, seeits talk page. |
No reliable source discusses this magazine. FailsMAGAZINE. Better to merge useful information or redirect it.Greenbörg(talk)08:03, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onHum Network Limited. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)12:00, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
From aWP:BEFORE search, I am not seeing any evidence that Hum Europe is independently notable of its parent network. It does not produce original content (thus not satisfyingWP:BCAST), and there does not seem to be third-party coverage of it independently from the Hum Network as a whole.M Imtiaz (talk ·contribs)18:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]