This article is within the scope ofWikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of thehistory of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject ofHistory on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofFrance on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Celts, a project which is currently considered to beinactive.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, pleasejoin the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country
What are accelerator dates??Jaberwocky6669 04:01, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
Dun Breaton & Coel Hen. -- This is the English Wikipedia. Generally, reference works should be listed in English, so that others can check your work. As well, Wikipedia is not a general Bibliography. Are those works cited in creating the current article? Thats what "reference" means, the article cites those works. If there is not allready a Breton language Wikipedia, you are free to create one. Your message on my talk page is improper behavior on Wikipedia and cause for concern.Stbalbach02:46, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Dun Breaton & Coel Hen. .. you have left another lengthy and bizzare message on my talk page. Is there some reason we can not discuss this article on the article discussion page? Is there some reason you must call me names, violating the rules of Wikipedia civil conduct? Is there some reason you believe the English Wikipedia must have a lengthy biography of non-English works? I understand you are very emotional about this topic, I might suggest calming down and take it easy and discuss this like an adult.Stbalbach19:41, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
SupportUser:Stbalbach. I doubt that some of the works cited have been used in the writing of the article. Unfortunately more effort appears to be going in to adding bibliographic references for very old sources of dubious value than in to more actually informative content in the article - especially in the modern period, which is somewhat threadbare at the moment.Man vyi14:45, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
of dubious value : you are totally wrong.old sources : 1991, 1994, 1996 ?I don't want start such ridiculous polemic.
Old sources:
Dom Lobineau Histoire de Bretagne, 2 vol. in-folio.,Paris,veuve Muguet, 1707.
Dom Morice et Dom Taillandier Histoire de Bretagne, 2 vol. in-folio.,Paris,veuve Delaguette, 1750-1756.
Dom Morice et Dom Taillandier Mémoires pour servir de preuves à l'Histoire de Bretagne, 3 vol. in-folio.,Paris,Ch.Osmont, 1742-1746.
Have these C18th publications genuinely been consulted in the writing of the article? If so, then they should be listed so that the sources can be verified. If you can give no such assurance, then I submit they are of dubious value (putting it politely) and should be weeded out. What should not be removed, please, are other users' comments on this talk page.Man vyi18:56, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Not but listen a little it should be calmed and not to irritate youthus like that. We are not in a specialized Hospital.Dom Lobineau and Dom Morice are the best Histories ofBrittany never written, they are the true ones monuments.If you have good sources, please write.And about the reference to the writings I do not have the time of me to occupysome immediately but wait a little and that’s come.And you know for the moment there is practically only “Prehistory” on the page in a territorywhich was not yet Bretagne but Armorica.If you remove these sources I remove also all that I wrote elsewhere.And all this would not positive for all.
Llyvarc' h Hen.
If I understand you correctly, you have not so far used these sources for your contributions to the article, but you intend to add information informed by these sources at some time in the future?Man vyi06:36, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly.Moreover this bibliography gives a quite good idea of the panorama of Breton Historiography along the centuries and that can be very appreciated per many people curious about the History of Brittany;These sources are also a considerable enrichment for this page and are a source of ideas of works for researchers.
Armorica is an historical name related by greek and roman authors. One can say that this name could have been in use before the roman invasion by the gallic tribes and that would give him a protohistoric age, but not a prehistoric one. As anyone thougth of moving the "prehistory of Russia" to the section "prehistory of Sarmatia?"Le gludic03:08, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, that's a fair point against the name Armorica. My point though was to suggestmoving the prehistorical material to an article on prehistory. Any thoughts on that?QuartierLatin196818:57, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This website was blocked by Wikipedia's apparently overzealous spam filter: www.lexilogos.com/bretagne_drapeau.htm . It's a pretty inoccuous page about the history of the Breton flag.QuartierLatin196817:37, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link onHistory of Brittany. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.
Hello, I was interested in adding a section of the history of Brittany during the French Revolution. Is it required that I become a part of the group for European History in order to add this section between pre-revolutionary and 19th century history?
level-5 vital article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
17:37, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
