Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Gone Girl (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theGone Girl (film) article.
This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL
Archives:1
While thebiographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced orpoorly sourced contentious material about living personsmust be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please seethis noticeboard.
This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to multipleWikiProjects.
WikiProject iconFilm:American
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you canjoin the discussion and see lists ofopen tasks andregional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation. To improve this article, please refer to theguidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by theAmerican cinema task force.
WikiProject iconUnited States:CinemaLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to theUnited States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported byWikiProject Film - American cinema task force.
WikiProject iconMissouriLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part ofWikiProject Missouri, aWikiProject related to theU.S. state ofMissouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit theproject page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to thediscussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCalifornia:Los AngelesLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theU.S. state ofCalifornia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported byLos Angeles area task force.
WikiProject icon2010s
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s
iconThis article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in theTop 25 Report6 times. The weeks in which this happened:

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between12 January 2021 and30 April 2021. Further details are availableon the course page. Student editor(s):Bambiwikipawdia. Peer reviewers:Jackkirk18,Bknight18,Alexisanderson89.

Above undated message substituted fromTemplate:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment byPrimeBOT (talk)21:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dallas Morning News video

[edit]

TheDallas Morning News made a video about the movie, but I am not sure if the video is still accessible. URL reference:http://web.archive.org/web/20141005152016/http://popcultureblog.dallasnews.com/2014/10/reel-genius-the-mischievous-thrills-of-gone-girl-which-may-keep-you-from-ever-getting-married.html/WhisperToMe (talk)05:33, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Work done on Plot by numerous wikipedians is very good but needs to be trimmed further

[edit]

I believe Wikipedia standards establish somewhere between 400 and 700? I've left it in 710 but I'm sure it can be trimmed further.AnyDosMilVint (talk)12:59, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AnyDosMilVint, I take it that you are not new to editing Wikipedia.
Regardingmy revert, I reverted back tothis version, which reverted more than one editor (not just you) and took away 118 characters. You thenrestored to 118 characters, stating that the plot summary was too long and that it "missed some important bits." And you thencut it by 353 characters. If anything, your edit may have cut something important. For example, I'm not sure if the life insurance aspect should be mentioned. It's been a long time since I've watched this film. As for the range given by theWP:Film plot guideline, it clearly states "unless the film's structure is unconventional [...] or unless the plot is too complicated to summarize in this range." It also states, "Discuss with other editors to determine if a summary cannot be contained within the proper range."WP:Film editors have consistently been clear that we do not have to be strict with this guideline.It's a guideline. Not a policy. Many Wikipedia film plot summaries go a little over the 700 range without any issues. We don't trim out important content. What to retain or cut from this article's plot section has been discussed times before, but it may be that all your edits are for the best. If you can get the section to 700 or under without cutting important detail, feel free. That shouldn't be difficult since the section likely has a word or two it doesn't need. If I object to anything else you cut, I'll note so on the talk page.Flyer22 Reborn (talk)15:10, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I am actually new to Wiki (which I assume accounts for my multiple edits instead of one); I tentatively tried other film plots and they had this 700 word rule in them in their, which is why I thought it would be universal. The life insurance bit I assumed could be seen as embedded in the generic statement "her murder, whose motive she made seem to be money-related", same as the gambling thing she says in passing in her flashback/confession to the audience. I also felt the need to write the primary motivation for going back to Missouri (namely his mother's cancer) but that added even more bulk to the text so I didn't, ditto for the fact that Nick is out on bond when Amy comes back to him. These things can be seen in the plot for the novel, but if anyone wants to add them to the film plot to make it more comprehensive and the 700-word rule is not set on stone, that's perfectly fine by me. I think I've contributed enough to this article for now.AnyDosMilVint (talk)18:40, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Fashion" Section

[edit]

Does this article really need a section on, "fashion"? It's not as if this film is known especially for its costume design.

This feels to me as if superfluous and inappropriate.

Wiki Education assignment: Research Writing

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between18 January 2022 and1 May 2022. Further details are availableon the course page. Student editor(s):Vesquilin21 (article contribs).

This movie should also be listed as a comedy

[edit]

Psychological thriller it may be, but I also believe this movie has too many blatant comedic elements to not include that it is also, at the very least, a black comedy.Agrudle (talk)03:14, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The plot clearly is ridiculous but I didn't laugh onceTalk toSageGreenRider00:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gone_Girl_(film)&oldid=1334691988"
Categories:
Hidden category:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp