Talk:Geraldine Page
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | Geraldine Page has been listed as one of theMedia and drama good articles under thegood article criteria. If you can improve it further,please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you canreassess it. Review: September 13, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
| This level-5 vital article is ratedGA-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quill and Pen (talk)22:16, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The following shows what was removed from this article by an editor: [[1]] and as you can see I did NOT remove referenced material. I did remove extraneous verbiage that was not needed. I don't think anyone particularly cares, or finds all that important, about whether Page did not show up for a performance. What is important is that she died and people were notified. Funeral attendance is important too as it shows how people within in her profession viewed her work. And for word smithing: A better choice of words would be died from a heart attack NOT died of a heart attack as written. The wordfrom indicates a cause as in "The child suffers from asthma or she died from a heart attack." The wordof expresses a relationship but not acause as the word from does.Quill and Pen (talk)15:55, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I changed a sentence from Page did to Page performed. She performed in a series not did a series. I also broke down a long-winded, poorly written sentence. Once I made sense of the sentence I realized Page had received two Emmys for two different shows. The sentences now reflect this.Quill and Pen (talk)04:21, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onGeraldine Page. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)06:34, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Reviewer:Auldhouse (talk·contribs)22:23, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be glad to review this article.Auldhouse (talk)22:23, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
b(MoS forlead,layout,word choice,fiction, andlists): b(citations toreliable sources): c(OR): d(copyvio andplagiarism):Good use of references and no issues. I fixed one dead link with an archive URL.
b(focused):
b(appropriate use withsuitable captions):He had nothing to "Hollywood Blacklist", he investigated the State Dept.2603:6000:D700:194D:1892:2DD:C5C9:5691 (talk)12:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The photo is not Geraldine Page. It’s Maureen Stapleton.2601:19C:4A04:31E2:5C75:8A4A:2C3E:E023 (talk)00:34, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
