Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Gerðr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleGerðr has been listed as one of thePhilosophy and religion good articles under thegood article criteria. If you can improve it further,please do so.If it no longer meets these criteria, you canreassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 28, 2009Good article nomineeListed
This article is ratedGA-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconMythologyMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is supported byWikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach toMythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editingthe article, and help usassess and improve articles togood and1.0 standards, or visit theWikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconNorse history and cultureHigh‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Norse history and culture, aWikiProject related to all activities of theNorthGermanic peoples, both inScandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of theKalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit theproject page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to thediscussion.Norse history and cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Norse history and cultureTemplate:WikiProject Norse history and cultureNorse history and culture
HighThis article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofwomen on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
WikiProject iconWomen in ReligionMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of theWomen in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconReligionMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles onReligion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help usassess and improve articles togood and1.0 standards, or visit thewikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.

GERD merge

[edit]

This page really ought to be merged withgastroesophageal reflux disease, which itself is a merge ofGERD andreflux esophagitis.JFW |T@lk 23:50, 15 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Why? This page is about a giantess, not a disease.Noneofyourbusiness20:56, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just as a note, a disambiguation page atGerd now handles this issue nicely.:bloodofox: (talk)21:27, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And I've fixed the page histories so the relevant edits are with the right pages.Graham8710:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review istranscluded fromTalk:Gerðr/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:maclean (talk)19:02, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (seeWikipedia:What is a good article?)
  1. It isreasonably well written.
    a(prose): b(MoS):
  2. It isfactually accurate andverifiable.
    a(references): b(citations toreliable sources): c(OR):
  3. It isbroad in its coverage.
    a(major aspects): b(focused):
  4. It follows theneutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It isstable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated byimages, where possible and appropriate.
    a(images are tagged and non-free images havefair use rationales): b(appropriate use withsuitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Notes
  • 6 images: public domain images hosted by the Commons.
  • The captions could be made more clear. "Skírnir continues his threats (1895) by Lorenz Frølich" - what does 1895 refer to? PerhapsSkírnir continues his threats, as illustrated by Lorenz Frølich (1895), like the The Raven example atWikipedia:Captions#Credits.
  • Prose: from the Lead, "Gerðr is attested in the Poetic Edda; compiled..." sentence - I don't think this is proper use of semi-colons.
  • Poetic Edda, there are numerous inline quotations but there seems to be two different translations (Thorpe and Bellows). Which translation are these quotes coming from?
  1. Captions: I believe I have now fixed the caption issue. Please let me know if not. I don't know if the year needs to beafter the name or not.
  2. Semi-colons: My mistake, I believe I've fixed this.
  3. Translations: There are actually three translations being used for thePoetic Edda in this article. Every line is referenced per the appropriation translation. Most of it is per Larrington. The stanzas are quotes from older (and often more accurate, actually) translations that are in the public domain. Each article I write of this sort usually has a few quotes. Quoting translations can add up over numerous articles and can result in copyright issues, so I find it safer to use public domain works unless they are poor choices. Fortunately, here they're not. I generally elect to use Larrington's translation for the body text because it's the most modern and available translation at the moment, even though it has shortcomings.:bloodofox: (talk)02:41, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking the time to look the article over. If you are interested, I currently have another article up for review:Geri and Freki. The current reviewer seems confused and is requesting a second opinion. It's a much shorter article. Perhaps you can help.:bloodofox: (talk)05:31, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gerðr&oldid=1207393322"
Categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp