Talk:Fine art
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theFine art article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
| Archives:1 |
| This It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article was selected as thearticle for improvement on 29 April 2013 for a period of one week. |
| This article was selected as thearticle for improvement on 29 June 2020 for a period of one week. |
Very confused about the meaning of that section. Do they mean the term "Fine Art" fell out of fashion, or Fine Art itself fell out of fashion?
As far as I'm aware, the 20th century has been full of famous movements with art that serves no practical or applied function. Even today there is still usage of "Fine Arts" in everyday speech is there not?
I have no idea what discipline this article is coming from, I'm studying Fine Arts and it's definitely a bit more than just a course name. In fact, I don't think many artworks made now are very pragmatic.134.7.244.98 (talk)09:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]