| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theFiddle article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
| Archives:1 |
| This It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| It is requested that one or moreaudio files of amusical instrument orcomponent beuploaded toWikimedia Commons and included in this article toimprove its quality by demonstratingthe way it sounds or alters sound. Please seeWikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request. |
In the section that breaks down (no pun intended) the styles of fiddling in Eastern Canada, a number of un-sourced (and I would contend un-true) statments are made. I would advocate that these be fixed with attribution to references, or removed entirely. In specific, I refer to:
This is a tonne of information I have learned through osmosis over the years, by being from the region, and my family being of a variety of the aforementioned backgrounds. I can play you the difference in styles, but unfortunately, I don't have the written resources to reference this. I hope that anyone who might be able to contribute will.—Precedingunsigned comment added byZapallon (talk •contribs)16:27, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This seems as if some overzealous editor removed any reference to the fact that the term is generally associated more with popular music forms than with orchestral music. I'm no expert so I won't try to fix this - certainly, the word is used in classical music, but as far as I can tell that is not where the word is most at home. Please fix.190.149.80.4 (talk)23:48, 15 January 2010 (UTC)◌[reply]
Yeah, I don't get this either. The first three sentences of the article contradict each other. Is it the same as a violin, most often a violin, or similar to the violin? Someone needs to clarify this stat.Ari1891adler (talk)16:29, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Fiddle" and "violin" simply come to English via 2 different paths (Germanic languages and Italian respectively). Classism determines which is used when: they're called "violins" when they're used to play music to be passively listened to by people in expensive clothing, but "fiddles" when used by working-class people to play music for dancing. But the instruments themselves are not significantly different in construction (the Hardingfele's drone strings notwithstanding).
I don't have the time to go through and make all the necessary corrections or even note them here, but I certainly hope someone does!—Precedingunsigned comment added by68.239.11.217 (talk)00:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
On the contrary, I would go the other way - a violin is merely one (the most common) type of fiddle. Some other types are superficiallys imiler e.g. haardanger fiddle; some are visually very different e.g. crwth. There are many kinds of fiddle from all over the world sich as spike fiddles in the East. So I would say the article needs expanded to become more diverse.StrumStrumAndBeHanged (talk)18:15, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is hard to know where to begin. FOr one thing, a history of viol instruments is not "fiddle". Fiddle is fiddle, violin is violin, viola de gamba is viola de gamba. We do not have articles about australopithecus talk about the dinosaurs, we do not have articles about amino acids talk at great length about nitrogen's atomic structure. AThe article on "Z" does not dwell at length on the letter "B". Etc. "Fiddle" is not a synonym for "violin".— Precedingunsigned comment added byGeofferybard (talk •contribs)
Here is a place to discussthis diff. For starters, all violins are fiddles, but not all fiddles are violins. The foremost difference between a violin and a fiddle is the attitude and style of the player. Generalizations about action height, bridge top curve, and tailpiece configuration are unsupportable and unencyclopedic. Many professionals do their fiddling on instruments set up to normal violin standards.
I doubt you could find a credibleorganologist who would deny that arebab is a spike fiddle. It most certainly is not "essentially a violin." __Just plain Bill (talk)20:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links onFiddle. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)08:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The article title and the orientation of the article does not quite make sense.Fiddle is a synonym forviolin so, as titled, this article should redirect to theviolin article. But this article largely discusses the violin-based folk music traditions around the world. An appropriate name for that would befiddling. I propose that
-- MC141.131.2.3 (talk)20:47, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the move request was:not movedTonyBallioni (talk)05:03, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fiddle →FiddlingFiddling – Per proposal, this article should be redirected toViolin and its content be moved toFiddling, with modifications.141.131.2.3 (talk) 18:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)--Relisting. — Amakuru (talk)21:44, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A direct move is not allowed for standard user becauseFiddling already exists. Users objected to doing a copy/paste so I'm requesting that an administrator do the move.
Thanks.
-- MC141.131.2.3 (talk)18:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If the scope of this article is limited to the modern anglosphere, then the great majority of fiddles are violins, or not much different from a modern standard violin. Even with such a limited scope, there are other fiddles, such as the cello in the Scottish traditional grouping of “wee fiddle and big fiddle” and the cigar-box fiddle sometimes used in the US old-time fiddling tradition. I’m not alone in having fiddled on a viola; it is possible to find books of fiddle tunes written in alto clef.
If the scope of the article is to include a global and historical view, then there are numerous examples of instruments which are fiddles, but not violins. Seerabeca anderhu.
With that in mind, the first sentence of the introduction, “Fiddle is another name for the bowed string musical instrument more often called a violin.” is incorrect, and contradicted by the cited reference. A better way of putting it will be something like “A fiddle is a bowed string musical instrument, often a violin.” which is consistent with the reference.Just plain Bill (talk)21:03, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onFiddle. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
YAn editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)09:44, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I was personally taught in orchestra class that the word fiddle can be used as slang for a violin but that a true fiddle has five strings. Four come from the violin and the fifth is from the viola. Also all the mediocre and better violin players in our moderately sized city of Columbus, Indiana had fine tuners on ALL their strings. And our local symphonies and orchestras violin players used them on all four strings as well. And that was 20 years ago!Alys Flux (talk)11:27, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The lead of this story violatesWP:MOSLEAD. I've never seen a Wikipedia article that starts by defining a word that isn't the subject of the article. I realize there's been debate about moving some of the article and that this was voted down. I also understand there's resistance to putting the definition offiddle first (as I recently attempted and was reverted). However, these two decisions-by-consensus contradict each other, and this contradiction should be resolved. Regardless of the subject or the contents, it's most important to followWP:MOSLEAD and start the article by defining its subject, as all other Wikipedia articles do (that I'm aware of). Seriously, if you wanted to learn whatFish are, wouldn't it be unhelpful if the article started off, "Fishing is the act of..."? Because that's exactly what happened to me — I wanted to learn what a fiddle is, not learn what fiddling is.-Jordgette[talk]20:04, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If there is no discussion on this topic (the D inWP:BRD), I am going to change the first part of the hatnote to, "This article is about the musical instrument and its playing styles. For more, seeViolin" and switch the sentence "Fiddling refers to the act of playing the fiddle, and fiddlers are musicians that play it" to the start of the lead's 2nd paragraph, which is actually about fiddling. Whereas the first paragraph almost exclusively concerns the instrument. It's most important to remove the confusion from the first sentence of the lead (as well as the hatnote); the article name (fiddle vs. fiddling) is less important.-Jordgette[talk]15:18, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirectFiddle and violin and has thus listed itfor discussion. This discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 8#Fiddle and violin until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.Steel1943 (talk)07:31, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirectVioloneux and has thus listed itfor discussion. This discussion will occur atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 8#Violoneux until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.Steel1943 (talk)07:41, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Do not use{{cite web}} or other citation templates in the External links section. Citation templates are permitted in the Further reading section. Others, listed below:
Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
Minimize the number of links.
External links in an article can be helpful to the reader, but they should be kept minimal, meritable, and directly relevant to the article. With rare exceptions, external links should not be used in the body of an article.
acceptable external links include those that contain further research that is accurate and on-topic, information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail, or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to its accuracy.
Disputed links should be excluded by default unless and until there is a consensus to include them. Please do not add back more links without consensus. Simple solution to facilitate career maintenance tag. Move links here for discussion.