This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

AutomobilesLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofautomobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

It is requested that aphotograph ofthe uniJet Turbo Diesel engine beincluded in this article toimprove its quality. The external toolWordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images onFlickr and other web sites.

Upload

It is requested that adiagram ordiagrams of acombustion engine beincluded in this article toimprove its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at theGraphic Lab. For more information, refer todiscussion on this page and/or the listing atWikipedia:Requested images.

Its just the traditional JTD that GM now own, and not the MultiJet common-rail, right? --Kiand 21:12, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

My reading of the press reports suggests that GM now owns the rights to all post-JV (1999+) technology as well as to the base engine. So this would include the modern JTD. I'm not sure if Fiat still retains any rights - reports have been contradictory. I would imagine that they retain pre-JV rights, and probably also get the JV-related work. --SFoskett 21:24, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

How did GM get all of these rights? Failed merger doesn't really explain it...

They didn't. Not according to thispress-release from GM Europe, which states both companies retain shared intelectual property of the 1.9 L engine technology and the factory where the 1.3 L engine is built. I interpret this to mean they share property on the injection system. The 1.9 L block belongs to Fiat, as it predates its use of direct injection. The 1.3 L engine block may belong solely to Powertrain. I don't know about the forthcoming 1.6 L. --Pc13 07:53, 2005 Jun 14 (UTC)

I have a new MultiJet Panda, and I'd not have bought it if I knew GM had engine rights, I have my reasons for seriously disliking them... --Kiand 21:25, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oh dear! How do you justify not liking GM. Can you tell us/me?

I used to dislike FIAT. In my opinion at the time i had good reason to dislike them. I had purchased two brand new cars from them. I now think it a complete waste of time to dislike any motor company based on one persons experience. They all provide a means to an end and are in a lot of cases very likeable.— Precedingunsigned comment added by81.178.150.66 (talk)07:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All hp values are actually for PS. --Pc13 13:42, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)

http://www.carpages.co.uk/alfa_romeo/alfa_romeo_diesels_in_the_uk_part_2_26_03_03.asp--—Typ932^{T |C} 16:55, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's also a version of the 1st-generation 1.3 Multijet with 85PS (62kW) that uses a variable-geometry turbocharger - I have one in my Fiat Doblo and was wondering whether it has been used elsewhere. OK to add?Nkh08 (talk)13:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link onJTD engine. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If necessary, add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/20120325223100/http://www.gmpowertrain.com/EuropeVehicleEngines/IntroductionEurope.aspx tohttp://gmpowertrain.com/EuropeVehicleEngines/IntroductionEurope.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue to let others know.

YAn editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online}14:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The 0.8L DDiS is not a Multijet variant, it was developed solely by Suzuki, it uses an all aluminum construction.Siddhesh2205 (talk)05:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ChieahDo you have references for your edits?I dont believe that to be true!Cheers :) 17:07, 11 September 2016 (UTC)— Precedingunsigned comment added byTanis8472 (talk •contribs)

Hey, could somebody take a look at the "layout" part? According to me it must say what the materials for the block & head are instead of what it currently says. Kindly disregard this note if what it says in the article is correct, no need to respond.

-Some passerby.189.154.182.225 (talk)18:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Start-Class Automobile articles
• Low-importance Automobile articles
• Automobile articles needing attention
• Wikipedia requested images of machinery
• Wikipedia requested images of cars
• Wikipedia requested engine diagrams

• All Wikipedia requested diagram images