This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

AutomobilesHigh‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofautomobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile High This article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale. BrandsMid‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofbrands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands Mid This article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.

I had to remove a TON of text from this article because it was copyvio fromhere. Even if it had not been copyvio, it was not encyclopedic writing. There were a ton of photos lifted from there, too. --SFoskett 01:41, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)

I think the "Also Called" part from the info box should be removed, as the 512TR and Especially the 512M are Significantly different cars.AppleRobin16:20, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will eat a cream cake for the first person who can illustrate this article with a legitimate photograph of the engine's red heads. -Ashley Pomeroy17:38, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clicking between this page and theBoxer engine page, I was looking to understand the difference between a 180 V engine and a boxer configuration. Aren't they just the same thing?

A flat plane where cylinders are horizontally opposed IS a boxer engine... right? Is there something unique about the crankshaft configuration that I'm not seeing? Because I fail to see the point in saying 180 V if it is just a Boxer Engine—Precedingunsigned comment added by24.63.242.54 (talk)17:07, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The crankshaft is different in Ferrari engine, its like those in V engine --—Typ932^{T |C} 17:20, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Too bad the top picture is of a 512 TR not a Testarossa.—Precedingunsigned comment added by129.74.145.136 (talk)06:08, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image used in this article,File:Ferraritestarossacabrio.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion atWikimedia Commons for the following reason:Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image isnon-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is nofair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to tryCommons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevantimage page (File:Ferraritestarossacabrio.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk)09:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

are there any sources to 4.9 l capacity?both nomenclature (5litres 12cylinders) and sources (like autozine) point to 5.0 capacity— Precedingunsigned comment added byYbsone (talk •contribs)15:50, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

4,943 cc is closer to 4.9 L -->Typ932^T·C16:01, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

it is not about which is closer, but which is ment by the manufacturer (ex 1779cc was named by Alfa 1750 not 1800)YBSOne (talk)21:21, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But the Testarossa is Testarossa not Testarossa 5.0 The "name" capacity is only used when its actual name or used often by magazines or such. for instance Mustang 5.0 -->Typ932^T·C13:08, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes testarossa doesn't have 5.0 in its name but it's successor does, 512TR, F512 M, also the 512BB and 512BBi had same capacity. Again 5 for liters, 12 for cylinders. There is a rule about the 1750 Alfa engines: capacity is 1779cc, name is 1750, but in wiki it is 1.8 as a capacity, because 1779 is much closer to 1,8. It is wise to just ask Ferrari Storico what is their opinion. On one hand it's a bit closer to 4.9 but on the other is almost as close to 5.0 and the name suggests 5.0YBSOne (talk)07:48, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the following sentence from theName section:

Unless someone cites an interview from Sergio Pininfarina, this is just speculation. Furthermore I highly doubt this has any basis, since in Italiantesta rossa is never used to refer to a red-haired person, as "redhead" is in English. —Cloverleaf II (talk)11:38, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links onFerrari Testarossa. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If necessary, add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/20081208183450/http://www.ferrariworld.com:80/FWorld/fw/index.jsp tohttp://www.ferrariworld.com/FWorld/fw/index.jsp
• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/20080829164306/http://www.qv500.com/ferraritrp4.php tohttp://www.qv500.com/ferraritrp4.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online}01:26, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links onFerrari Testarossa. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If necessary, add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/20081208183450/http://www.ferrariworld.com:80/FWorld/fw/index.jsp tohttp://www.ferrariworld.com/FWorld/fw/index.jsp
• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/20081208183450/http://www.ferrariworld.com:80/FWorld/fw/index.jsp tohttp://www.ferrariworld.com/FWorld/fw/index.jsp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online}15:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• B-Class Automobile articles
• High-importance Automobile articles
• B-Class Brands articles
• Mid-importance Brands articles
• WikiProject Brands articles