Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Eugen Relgis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A fact fromEugen Relgis appeared on Wikipedia'sMain Page in theDid you know column on 21 March 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: A record of the entry may be seen atWikipedia:Recent additions/2011/March.
Wikipedia
This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited tojoin the project andcontribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
WikiProject iconAnti-warLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Anti-war, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theanti-war movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anti-warWikipedia:WikiProject Anti-warTemplate:WikiProject Anti-warAnti-war
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconDeafLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part ofWikiProject Deaf, the WikiProject which seeks to improve articles relating to all aspects ofdeaf-related andDeaf culture. For the Project guidelines, see theproject page ortalk page.DeafWikipedia:WikiProject DeafTemplate:WikiProject Deafdeaf
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconJewish historyLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofJewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconJournalismLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofjournalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLibrariesLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofLibraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMedicine:SocietyLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow theManual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any articleuse high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bythe Society and Medicine task force.
WikiProject iconAnarchism
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofanarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism
 

Did you know

Redirects for discussion

Featured article candidates

Good article nominees

Requested moves

Cleanup (0) ·Potentially related articles ·Recent edits ·Recent Commons images ·Stub expansion project (477)

WikiProject iconPhilosophyLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related tophilosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join thegeneral discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPoetryLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofpoetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconRomaniaLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofRomania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconSexology and sexualityLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofhuman sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSocialismLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofsocialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSociologyLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofsociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSymbolism and Art Nouveau
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Symbolism and Art Nouveau, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related toSymbolism andArt Nouveau on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Symbolism and Art NouveauWikipedia:WikiProject Symbolism and Art NouveauTemplate:WikiProject Symbolism and Art NouveauSymbolism and Art Nouveau
WikiProject iconUruguayLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part ofWikiProject Uruguay, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related toexpatriates in Uruguay. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit theproject page, where you canjoin the project and see alist of objectives.UruguayWikipedia:WikiProject UruguayTemplate:WikiProject UruguayUruguay
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconVeganism and VegetarianismLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofveganism andvegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconVisual arts
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofvisual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts

Way to many categories and projects

[edit]

This article has far to many categories and projects.wp:overcategorization I removed a few what seem to be obviously peripheral projects, and a bunch of what look like less central categories, but there are still far to many projects and categories. Should only list those categories that are most appropriate, most characterisitic - the most apropos 4 or 5 (but even whittling it down to the most apropos dozen would be a good start.) There are also too many projects listed - again was this person particularly noted for being a librarian (e.g.) (is their major contribution to the world in the field of librarianship, or whatever), if not then consider removing said project.Zodon (talk)05:13, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you mean we should introduce aWP:POV on which aspects of his activity are most important. Btw, where exactly is this "don't add too many projects" policy? As for the categories, I fail too see which categories overlap in this instance. Do we have him under a "Sociologists active in 1930", "Sociologists active in 1932" etc. system?Dahn (talk)11:24, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please see overcategorization above. The point is not to tag every little thing, but to get the cental, defining categories for this page. What points are defining for this individual and their notability.
IfBarack Obama can manage with a mere 37 categories, this page certainly doesn't need 72. If you have questions about the guidelines, then the talk page on the guidelines is a good place for them.
Did not say they overlap - just that they are excessive. Is this person really noted for being each one of these things. (i.e. not just were they one, but did they make a major contribution to that group).Zodon (talk)19:59, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If they don't overlap, how do you distinguish between the "important" and "unimportant" ones without imposing a POV? What's more, the guideline you refer to is quite clearly about categories which do overlap, so I don't really need to go discuss it there - it simply doesn't apply here. And I don't see the point of the Obama analogy: Obama is very noted for being a few things, Relgis is moderately noted for being many things.Dahn (talk)20:05, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
To put it briefly, having too many categories detracts from the article. It overwhelms the reader, and essentially all categories become useless. It also suggests attempting to overcompensate for somebody who didn't do anything of note. (i.e. they didn't do anything that stood out, so they were just mediocre at a lot of things, whatever they actually did is buried fluff). Somebody likeLeonardo da Vinci is noted for being excellent at many things (a Renaisance man) but the article still manages with 30 some categories.
As far as NPOV, considerWikipedia:NPOV_tutorial#Categorization.
If you were limited to saying 5 things about this person, what would they be?
The categorization should focus on what is the reason that they have a wikipedia article, not the characteristics of the person (i.e. why are they notable). alsoWikipedia:Categorization andWikipedia:Categorization of people
"Limit the number: Try to limit the number of categories. For example, a film actor who holds a law degree should be categorized as a film actor, but not as a lawyer unless his or her legal career was notable in its own right. However it is also important to ensure that categories contain all of the most relevant articles. This means that some prominent people, such as senior politicians who have held many different offices, will be in a considerable number of categories. Apart from these factual categories, for those categories that require an assessment of personal characteristics (e.g. art movement style...), try to limit the number of categories to what is most essential about this person, something in the vein of: "give me 4 or 5 words that best characterize this person."Zodon (talk)06:55, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Let me explain again: Relgis is not an actor with a law degree; he is a person who, based onwhat sources say (not on what I interpret to be "most important" about him) has had a contribution in many fields, and yes, they all are reasons why we have this article. Instead of lecturing me about how some categories don't belong herepotentially, what say you actually read the text and then make suggestions that are based on realities, not on abstract analogies?Dahn (talk)07:49, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I did makesuggestions based on the text, however you have so far rejected all of them.
Asside - no idea what happened on my recent edit. All I told it to do was to add the tag{{too many categories}}. Wikipedia or my browser must have glitched in a major way to have cut out a big chunk of the article.Zodon (talk)07:58, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Eugen_Relgis&oldid=1267854200"
Categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp