This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theEdith Rigby article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
![]() | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onEdith Rigby. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue orfailed to let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)09:33, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Are you not supposed to sign this???
Anyway, my name is Maurice J. Halton MA PhD - I am the author of the paper/article entitled "William Lever and Edith RigbyAn examination of the evidence relating to the burning of Roynton Cottage at Rivington, Lancashire on Tuesday 8th July 1913"
If anybody needs to know if I am willing to allow Fairchristobelle to cite my research, just email me [mauricehalton@gmail.com]
TTFN
FairchristobelleFairchristabelle (talk)20:47, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article currently has her dying in both 1948 and 1950; also a blue plaque pictured has 1948. Looking at FreeBMD and probate notices, the correct year is 1950. On FreeBMD the only Edith Rigby who died in England and Wales in 1948 was aged 2 but a 77 year old died in 1950 in Conway Valley RD. Probatehttps://probatesearch.service.gov.uk/Calendar?surname=rigby&yearOfDeath=1950&page=2#calendar has Edith Rigby of LLanrhos dying 23 July 1950.Nedrutland (talk)07:32, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The opening sentence of the article was changed byUser:Duppy Conkeror from
Edith Rigby (néeRayner) (18 October 1872 – 23 July 1950) was an Englishsuffragette andarsonist.
to
Edith Rigby (néeRayner) (18 October 1872 – 23 July 1950) was an Englishsuffragette who usedarson as a way to further the cause of women’s suffrage.
User:Viewmont Viking then undid the edit with the explanation that it was better the way it was before. Viewmont Viking, would you be able to expand on that reasoning?Richard Nevell (talk)14:52, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Viewmont Viking - I think the orignal sentence is misleading it states that Edith was a suffragette and arsonist, as if they are two seperate things. But the arson she carried out was due to her poltical beliefs in women's suffrage and that should be made clear in the opening sentence. people may not read down to the later explanation in the article, first impressions are important. Also look at Neslon Mandela's Wikipedia entry, there is no mention of criminal activity in his opening paragraph yet he was involved in planning a bombing campaign. If arson is to be mentioned in Edith Rigby's opening paragraph it should be qualified by why she carried out that action.Duppy Conkeror (talk)16:07, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi@Viewmont Viking: see above.
Thanks for making the change,→Duppy Conkeror, it's good to see this resolved.Richard Nevell (talk)17:54, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]