- The following is a closed discussion of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider amove review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was:Not moved.HueMan1 (talk)01:07, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It has verification and notability issues, and is owned by EWTNSoftlemonades (talk)20:12, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose, on the grounds are best served by having the distinct history of the paper, over 95-years-worth, discussed separately from the media conglomerate.Klbrain (talk)09:49, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Although EWTN owns NCR, the two organizations are separate. NCR was founded 54 years before EWTN. The article discusses the NCR as a separate entity, and it also doesn't meet the requirements to be mergedWP:MERGEREASON.EXANXC (talk)14:12, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose – This paper is the last remnant of an entire chain of newspapers that would be difficult to merge into eitherEWTN orRoman Catholic Archdiocese of Denver.MinhNguyễn 💬03:35, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose, it has verification issues but it does not have notability issues and verification issues are not grounds to merge on.Horse Eye's Back (talk)15:57, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
