Talk:E!
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theE! article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
 | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipediacontributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may includeconflict of interest,autobiography, andneutral point of view. |
 | Tip: Anchors arecase-sensitive in most browsers. This article containsbroken links to one or more targetanchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking thepage history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed |Report an error |
In the section of this article, "Controversies and bias", an author states that "E! is often accused of dispensing 'shallow' and 'irrelevant' news and of supporting a liberal bias. It is strongly critical of the Republican Party in general, and George W. Bush in particular, especially of his judgment in beginning the Iraq War."
I think this section should be deleted if examples of such liberal bias are not listed. It is definitely unfair to deem the network biased without evidence for our readers to decide for themselves. This section seems to be more of an opinion than a fact and belongs in a blog and not Wikipedia.
H from Steps and Michael J Fox
Diseny does not own any part of E! anymoreComast bought it's part for 1.23 billion dollars in November 2006Maybe you should check all of your facts because I doudt this is all that's wrong--KELLY CLARKSON NUMBER 1 SINGER!20:43, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It also shows onNilesat
There used to be a bumper segment with a man (wearing a helmet?) carrying the E! logo around on his back while music played and some deep voices said "E!" I think there was a part where papparazzi camera bulbs flashed at you. The tune and segment ended with the E! logo on screen and the same deep-voiced "E!" Does anyone remember this?NBK1122 (talk)00:12, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why is Howard Stern no longer mentioned as once having a show on E!?71.101.84.191 (talk)00:27, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
For some reason only Canada is mentioned, there's a lot of missing information there about other International versions, such as the UK one which broadcasts on Sky 151.Digifiend (talk) 23:40, 26 August 2012 (UTC)I agree. This should be added. For reference E! started broadcasting 02 December 2002 (according to BARB2002 documentation from AGB Nielsen).Stephen Howe (talk)14:20, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comcast's "Video On Demand" is presented by something called "E! Presents - Video On Demand" featuring a rotation of various well-known E! hosts. This cannot be listed in the stub article on E! programming because it does not air on E!, but it IS an example of an E! production. I don't know where it should go in this article, but it is significant in that it is seen by many people and showcases E!'s store of hosting talent.jg (talk)06:33, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Currently, the only entry in the "See Only" section is "Reelz." Apparently it is listed due to its similarity of content to E!'s early incarnation as Movietime. I don't see any other connection - certainly no direct connection. Its slight similarity to what E! once was is dubious enough, but there is even less reason to "See Also" it now. If the goal was to present a list of similar channels, others could be found that share some elements in common with E!. I'm not sure why we would want such a list, but if similar content is an interest to a reader of this article; then, it should be better than this one, random-seeming, entry. Thoughts?jg (talk)06:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link onE!. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If necessary, add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online18:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 | There is a discussion atTalk:NBCUniversal that people here might be interested in; it pertains to the spinoff of cable channels owned by Comcast and its subsidiary NBCUniversal into a new company tentatively named SpinCo. |
2601AC47 (talk|contribs)Isn't a IP anon13:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
