Talk:Dinotrux
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | Dinotrux is currently a Televisiongood article nominee.Nominated byUser:Easternsaharaplease reviewthis andthis at 22:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with thegood article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review,click here and then edit the page.
Short description: 2015 American children's television series |
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theDinotrux article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
 | This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I was looking at this article and I noticed that when I used the colorblind filter -[1] - the table colors were hard to distinguish for the colorblind. PerWP:COLOR, can someone help find a different color for at least one of the tables?ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps)17:00, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Someone keeps adding back in the same 2 sentences at the end of the lede: "The fourth season was going to be released on April 22, 2019 but it has been postponed. The fourth season will be released on either September or October 2019."
There is so far no release date for this. Previously, the person adding these sentences linked toa cinamaholic article which simply speculates on a 4th season (and also provides no references, so is thusnot a reliable source). I have added "Citation Needed" several times, and several others have done the same or even deleted the sentences, but they keep getting added back. We seem to be in3-Revert-Rule Territory here, and I recommend we request an administrator's arbitration on the matter. --Ishmayl (talk)19:59, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Previously, the article was bloated with a lot ofWP:Fancruft but there seem to be various reliable or mostly reliable sources on this topic.
🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩22:40, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Nominator:Easternsahara (talk ·contribs)22:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewer:Joereddington (talk·contribs)09:55, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Go on then, I've watched this with the kids.
Initial 'as-reading' thoughts, I'll do the proper table shortly.
Lead:
Premise:
Characters:
I'm bumping on the fact we have Garby but not D-Struct's minion and the other reptools, who are respectively much larger characters (at least early one, possibly they get killed off in season three)
Episodes:
I don't think it's in the GA criteria (and I'm mindful about overstepping) but there's nothing in the list of seasons that readers can't get from the table and I'd drop it. It's definitely not in the GA criteria to complain about the sources for episode numbers being future sources rather than past ones so don't worry about that.
My main query in this section is "Why *did* they call it supercharged?"
Production and release:
Second paragraph _looks_ ORy - I'll come back and check that later. I was expecting more from this section - interviews with creators and so on.
Reception, themes and analysis:
There's been an undercurrent of slightly odd phrasing throughout and this section is particularly in need of a copy edit. There are various [who?] flags here - I don't remember if that's official GA but I personally think it's worth dealing with them.
In general this paragraph is mostly negative and I honestly think there exist somewhere people who like it (it got awards and seven seasons) so some balance is needed here.
Extra:
I think I would expect this sort of article to include a section on merchandising
Overall:
I think I will do a full review with the table in a day or so, but I think at the moment it's bordering on aquickfail either on the basis of needing substantialcopyediting or because it doen't address several major aspects of the topic: in particular, awards, popularity and audience reception, and merchandising or other spin-off products.
If you wanted to take a run at the comments above (which may or may not be valid) before I do the review proper, that would be cool. I'll go and watch some episodes with the 5yo over the next couple of days.
Joe (talk)11:00, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review Joe, I have responded to your comments. I'll be expanding the season-by-season plot section because it was pointed out to me that even though I can't include an episode-by-episode summary of the plot because ofMOS:SIZE, I still need to include a season-by-season summary as done inthe 30 Rock article.User:Easternsaharareview this17:06, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
