Talk:Dermatology
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This level-4 vital article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between16 August 2018 and4 December 2018. Further details are availableon the course page. Student editor(s):Alanaxthomas1.
Above undated message substituted fromTemplate:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment byPrimeBOT (talk)19:21, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't the "list of diseases" be separate from a page on what dermatology is? --zandperl 19:24, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
I eliminated the bit about skin cancer clinics in Australia being run by nondermatologists and am trying to clean up the grammer.Philiphughesmd02:55, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The section "diagnosis" is almost identical to the same section under "Malignant melanoma". Shouldn't this content be in one place or the other, but not both?24.215.235.4816:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I deleted a reference to "Skin Deep" which is someone's personal website.Philiphughesmd22:40, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This page suffers from daily mindless vandalism. Would it help to have it{{sprotected}}?JFW | T@lk19:31, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The rashes and skin conditions actually links to "skin disease" which redirects to the this article's page. An article should probably not be in its own see also—Precedingunsigned comment added byTossrock (talk •contribs)06:11, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The dermatology article at present describes the situation in the USA: dermatologists there seem to have become specialised surgeons, with minimal training in general medicine, unlike the physicians they are in much of the rest of the world.NRPanikker (talk)09:28, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why is article exclusive to MDs? Worldwide Nurses and allied health professionals work and specialise in derm. In the Uk Nurse led derm clinics provide vast and essential coverage in the management of skin disease - why the protectionism? Additions made to include nurse and allied health contributions (which are substantial) are deleted - please justify.— Precedingunsigned comment added by146.87.52.51 (talk)11:16, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dr. Saad R. Abed MD of Dermatology & pharmacology.I see this Articles of descripe of skin need other up to date new informations. So I can send my lecture to you if you want.Title of the lecture is Basic structure of skin.RegardsAlnasiry saad (talk)20:46, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
describeAlnasiry saad (talk)20:55, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
describe instead of descripeAlnasiry saad (talk)20:56, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps adding information regarding the kinds of processes medical professionals have to go through to become dermatologists in other countries such as Pakistan, India, China etc. may enrich the article and make it less "American". If so i can add some information along with some reputable sourcesTahirShahab97 (talk)08:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An interesting press release on EurekAlert: [http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-03/osu-ro032409.php 'Master regulator' of skin formation discovered].
I noticed that Acne is not mentioned in this article, this subject should be included, or at least listed with acne treating procedures.— Precedingunsigned comment added byGUnit594 (talk •contribs)11:16, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think medical articles on WP should include information on to what extent the current practice is "Evidence-Based"? There is no critique in here on the effectiveness of modern dermatological practice and whether or not dermatology is practiced strictly according to sound science.Herbxue (talk)17:10, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that the academic requirements to become a dermatologist are included; however, the approximate salary of these dermatologists is not included. Since the article describes different branches and skills of a dermatologist, I think an approximate salary would be relevant for each skill, so that one could see how dermatologists are ranked by salary. For example, "Would a dermatologist who specializes in cosmetic dermatology make more than a dermatologist that specializes in dermatopathology?"Alanacrabb (talk)16:09, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Over the last 24h an IP editor185.27.218.3 (talk ·contribs) has repeatedly added content to the effect that most dermatopathologists are dermatologists by background, or that indeed they should be. Being in Europe I have no idea whether this is factually true in the United States, or whether there is a professional society that has a viewpoint to that effect. In Europe, dermatopathology is a subspecialty of pathology. Therefore, I don't think we can claim that most dermatopathologists are (or should be) dermatologists. The same editor has made the same changes ondermatopathology.JFW | T@lk17:03, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links onDermatology. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)07:11, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a reason why some student op-ed is referenced in the opening paragraph of this important article? The reference is quite useless.ChunyangD (talk)03:38, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between26 August 2024 and6 December 2024. Further details are availableon the course page. Student editor(s):Muffinlover419 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated byMuffinlover419 (talk)17:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
