| This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links onDemographics of Belarus. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue orfailed to let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)19:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links onDemographics of Belarus. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)13:47, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that birth and death numbers have been reverse engineered from population numbers since around 2021 assuming zero migration. While the population numbers are given by BelStat for each year as well as breakdowns by age (recently only 5-year age bands) but using those numbers assuming zero migration to calculate births and deaths is dubious. Perhaps recent (post 2020) birth and death numbers should be updated if possible or dropped. Instead, the article could list the breakdown by age with special respect to the 0-4 age category.
I think that there is a potential mix up as most years have mid year estimates while for 2021 I think the number is for January 1, 2021. Anyways, a reference is missing. I am inclined to take those nrs for 2021 down unless a reference is provided.— Precedingunsigned comment added by142.1.12.204 (talk)14:19, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In the sex ratio section it says 0–14 years: 87.266 male(s)/female15–24 years: 87.266 male(s)/femaleThis seems like an incredibly extreme gender ratio, and while the population pyramid shows a male surplus in 0-24 years old, it is not nearly this extreme.2600:1700:FDB0:14E0:4925:12D0:BEA5:E7A8 (talk)02:48, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]