This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Psychology This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofPsychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology ??? This article has not yet received a rating on theproject's importance scale. Culture This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture ??? This article has not yet received a rating on theproject's importance scale.

SeeWP:PROPOSAL for Wikipedia's procedural policy on the creation of new guidelines and policies. Seehow to contribute to Wikipedia guidance for recommendations regarding the creation and updating ofpolicy and guideline pages.

This is the more common terminology, so I'm suggesting this as the target page. I don't see enough here to be a stand-alone article and once you remove theexcess information about Native Americans from the other article, it also becomes pretty small.TheDracologist (talk)19:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose merge at this stage. The two articles appear to cover similarly named, but subtly different, concepts. This article covers culture change as an aspect of public policy, a deliberate & intentional process (cf.Social engineering (political science)); the other article covers changes in culture as an organic process, and is consequently not a subset of the topic here.NOTE: I agree that the other article requires significant clean up; and that its topic may not be notable. -Ryk72^'c.s.n.s.'08:07, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Ryk72 has a good point. Instead, one could also consider merging it withsociocultural evolution. PS. There is also a related merge discussion on talk of SCE article, and I'd invite interested editors to comment there too. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here}07:20, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An insightful look into the workings of cultural evolution may be gained from this paper on cultural change. There are, however, a few areas in which it may be improved. First of all, the article might benefit from having additional instances to support its points, particularly in the section on social conflict. Readers will comprehend the idea of cultural change in the context of social conflicts better with the aid of specific and understandable examples. Secondly, the article may be enhanced by providing a more organized method of presenting the information. Subheadings and a simpler layout may be used to improve the content's readability. Moreover, improving the explanation of the basic concepts discussed in the piece, including "cultural capital" and "shifting social zeitgeist," would foster a more profound comprehension of the topic. Last but not least, by removing unnecessary phrases and repetitions, the piece might be made shorter and sharper while maintaining its interesting and direct content.Danaalmeer (talk)11:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Start-Class psychology articles
• Unknown-importance psychology articles
• WikiProject Psychology articles
• Start-Class culture articles
• Unknown-importance culture articles
• WikiProject Culture articles