This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Visual arts This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofvisual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts Sculpture This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofSculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture Popular culture (inactive) This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Popular culture, a project which is currently considered to beinactive.Popular cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular cultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular culturePopular culture

Spelling Note. The OED indeed has collectable as the primary entry, allowing (also collectible). The OED does not conceed, as the spelling note implies, that because someone in the US wasn't sure how the word was to be spelt, they had a stab at it, and somehow infected the masses with that spelling, and that this should now be the preferred spelling. On the contrary, although most people understand what is meant when the word is spelt "funny", they prefer it to be spelt correctly, as in something which is "able" to "be collected", rather than something that is "ible" to be collected. One could imagine a four year old perhaps hearing the word as it's pronounced (ible) and thinking that is also how it is spelt. Perhaps the users of the spelling "collectible" would like to start putting entries in for foreseeible, repairible, searchible, maintainible, et cetera.....

In this encyclopedia, we should have the primary spelling as the heading, with the alternative as a secondary.—Precedingunsigned comment added by61.95.20.70 (talk •contribs)

As there has been no response to this amendment, I will change the spelling as proposed—Precedingunsigned comment added by113.233.185 (talk •contribs)

The above argument ("ible" to be...) is complete nonsense. See the usage note in the-ible entry at Wiktionary. -dcljr(talk)17:55, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The OED is kind of the golden standard for English though.Pnkrockr18:22, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad to see that "collectible" is still the primary - and that someone who can't even spell "concede" has his rants summarily ignored.64.221.248.1716:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The original poster did not put his point forward well. Certainly the "able to be" argument doesn't really hold water. However, there is a more compelling argument. TheOxford English Dictionary is not called the Oxford American English Dictionary. The OEDdoes not concede that the correct spelling is -ible, with -able as an acceptable substitute - instead it is the other way around. And the OED isthe final word regarding spellings in English. Again, the language is called 'English' for a reason. Do not imagine that Wikipedia is some American sandbox that you occasionally allow the lowly denizens of the UK to play in. This is not the case.Mikejstevenson12:57, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is a nationalistic argument if there ever was one on this wiki. Neither spelling is "more correct" than the other, they are both perfectly correct depending on where you are speaking it. Per the wiki's guidelines, this article should not have been moved solely to appease the preferences of one group over another; it should have been left at the original name unless there was a substantial reason and consensus to change it. The OED isnot a singular authority on the English language as you assert; it is by definition a British reference and therefore not a neutral reference in a discussion like this (i.e. any other article on this wiki with regard to AE/BE spelling). It is not a compelling argument whatsoever, it is bias plain and simple. Yes, the language is called "English" because in Ye Olde Times it originated in England; but neither Americans nor modern Britons use that variation of the language anymore. Theyboth are different from their common root, so one has no primacy over the other. Also: get over yourself. You've done no favors for the image of the British people.76.253.0.17 (talk)06:04, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article defines "collectibles" as "a manufactured item designed for people to collect." That clearly excludes a great many things people do collect, that were not solely designed and made for sale to actual or potential collectors. It clearly excludes a number of the categories the article lists as popular collectibles--especially stamps and coins.

The article should be redone and expanded, to define and describe the vast number of "collectibles" in general--not just the subset of manufactured items designed and made exclusively for collectors to collect.

Islands Phonecards Database (http://telecards.islands.co.il) is the leading site in phone card collections (see ratings in Alexa). Why was its link removed?—Precedingunsigned comment added by82.166.221.223 (talk)08:39, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This link, as with the majority of links on this article, do not add to the article itself. I have removed most of the links underWP:EL. Please don't add them back. --malo(tlk)(cntrbtns)17:12, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OnWP:EL check no.3 of what should be linked:

• Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks) or other reasons.

So, basically, you kept a link to a site that has not been updated since 2002 and removed all the others? How does that seem logical to you?—Precedingunsigned comment added by89.1.158.208 (talk)00:45, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Favicon ACC.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use inthis Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.

Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk)06:26, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really mind whether the -ible or -able version is used, but what is important is that the reference given, toAmerican and British English spelling differences, is useless, as that article doesn't actually cover the specific matter of -ible/-able at all!81.153.106.38 (talk)00:20, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In America, at least, it seems that "collectible" is used when talking about collecting objects of recognized or perhaps intrinsic value (such as antiques or rare coins), whereas "collectable" is used when referring to objects which are acquired mainly for personal reasons (such as ceramic figurines from the Hallmark store or other flea market trinkets).

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link onCollectable. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20110723034110/http://www.byte-time.net/souvenir/ch4.htm tohttp://www.byte-time.net/souvenir/ch4.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue orfailed to let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)21:06, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Start-Class visual arts articles
• WikiProject Visual arts articles
• Start-Class sculpture articles
• WikiProject Sculpture articles