This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Websites:ComputingLow‑importance This article is part ofWikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the majorwebsites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit theproject page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theimportance scale. This article is supported byWikiProject Computing. Internet cultureMid‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofinternet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture Mid This article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests :View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article fromhere orhere Photo :Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are locatedhere Other :Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to getYouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See alsoCategory:Internet culture articles needing attention ComedyMid‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcomedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy Mid This article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: Chicago Magazine, opinion, reception, interview[1]

Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= or|ans= parameter tono to reactivate your request.

Add "And them's the facts!" to the end of the article to clarify that the article is over.128.237.195.188 (talk)19:44, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: What ?Mlpearc(open channel)20:10, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The vandalism is inspired bythis ClickHole article, if you were wondering.Pbtflakes (talk)21:28, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to run afoul of any Wikipedia policy on what constitutes "controversy," but is what currently exists in the "Controversy" section really that? I don't think people being confused about relatively obvious satire is all that controversial. Nor is the quasi-philosophical question as to whether ClickHole is "clickbait parody" or "parody-as-clickbait."Efyeahimamarxist (talk)15:23, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It took a while but since the Controversy section did not contain any actual controversy I merged it with the Reception section. Comments from critics, and the audience failing to understand that the site was satirical broadly fits under Reception. --109.78.248.150 (talk)13:11, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"it was revealed that the ClickHole team meets frequently to brainstorm about new ideas and topics that can be written about."

Is this supposed to be some kind of Onion satire? Pretty sure every news/satire/writing organization on the planet "meets frequently to brainstorm" ... this is written like it was some great big reveal. Scrap this entire section, it's irrelevant. Nothing different than what every news/satire organization does.— Precedingunsigned comment added byYellowjournalism (talk •contribs)03:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you see a problem, you're encouraged tobe bold andfix it. – Muboshgu (talk)04:07, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And them's the facts— Precedingunsigned comment added by2A02:C7D:5B7B:1900:DC9E:F8AA:434E:731C (talk)11:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC) and them's the fact[reply]

Thisedit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Hi, not sure if I'm doing this correctly, but I'm a representative from ClickHole, and I was hoping someone could correct some inaccuracies on our Wikipedia page. Currently, the owner is listed as Cards Against Humanity LLC, whereas ClickHole is an employee-owned independent entity legally registered as ClickHole LLC. Also, the editor-in-chief is listed as Matt Powers, who has not been employed by the website in a couple years. The current editor-in-chief is Steve Etheridge. Additionally, the staff is listed as having 30 members, when in actuality we have six full-time staff members. Most of this information can be verified by article 11 under the references section——this is the most recent and accurate reporting on the company. If you need additional verification, please contact ClickHole's editor-in-chief, who can be reached at setheridge@clickhole.com. Thanks!

 Not done: please providereliable sources that support the change you want to be made. -QuadColour (talk)01:44, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• C-Class Websites articles
• Low-importance Websites articles
• C-Class Websites articles of Low-importance
• C-Class Computing articles
• Unknown-importance Computing articles
• All Computing articles
• All Websites articles
• C-Class Internet culture articles
• Mid-importance Internet culture articles
• WikiProject Internet culture articles
• C-Class Comedy articles
• Mid-importance Comedy articles
• WikiProject Comedy articles
• Implemented requested edits