Talk:Christian right
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | Thecontentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates topost-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a contentious topic. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with thecontentious topics procedures before editing this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, any expectedstandards of behaviour, or anynormal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
| Thecontentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates toabortion, a contentious topic. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with thecontentious topics procedures before editing this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, any expectedstandards of behaviour, or anynormal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
| Thecontentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates togender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a contentious topic. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with thecontentious topics procedures before editing this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, any expectedstandards of behaviour, or anynormal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theChristian right article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
Archives:1,2,3,4,5,6Auto-archiving period:30 days  |
 | This article iswritten inAmerican English, which has its own spelling conventions (center,color,defense,realize,traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from othervarieties of English. According to therelevant style guide, this should not be changed withoutbroad consensus. |
 | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to multipleWikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Archives | ||||||
| ||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than30 days may be auto-archived byLowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4. |
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk)15:36, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk)12:21, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps this should just be "Associated political parties."
To the extent that all these parties are minor, this seems like a pretty pointless section.
Moreover, some of these parties are not minor--for example, the list includes the PolishLaw and Justice party, which is the dominant party in Polish politics (largest bloc in the Sejm and Senate, and the party of the current president and prime minister).69.30.188.35 (talk)06:47, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
One paragraph here ends with the claim, "Beginning around thepresidency of Donald Trump, Christian conservatives have largely refrained from engaging in debates about sexual morality." This links to an article from 2018 stating that Christian conservatives had largely seemed to have given up on overturning gay marriage. However, by this point five years later, it seems abundantly clear that after Trump's loss in 2000, Christian conservatives pivoted strongly back towards an anti-homosexuality message, particularly aimed at transgender people. The number of prominent figures who have engaged in "groomer" rhetoric and who have assisted in passing laws targeting the rights of trans people in multiple states certainly seems to indicate that this sentence no longer holds true and that sexuality is once again a major, if not the central, plank of the religious right's campaigning in the US.2601:840:4480:30:11F2:3A82:AEF:E6C0 (talk)12:58, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article seems to have a liberal bias.Nononsense101 (talk)15:13, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
explain the rationale for the tag on the talk page in a manner that helps editors identify the concern and fix it themselves.ButlerBlog (talk)16:32, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
it is not clear what the neutrality issue is. I'm not opposed to you tagging the article for POV if there is something of concern, but this is an article with about 10,000 words of prose - you need to identify specifics because otherwise, no one really knows what the problem actually is.ButlerBlog (talk)16:47, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Self-troutNononsense101 (talk)17:31, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
