![]() | This article is ratedStub-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is a bad paraphrase of several tourism websites. Perhaps somebody can clean it up to something more useful and unique?James08414:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Several other sources in the internet, which includes some .gov.in sites likehttp://keralatourism.gov.in/index.php?source=desti&destid=6636014&catid=&zone=1 seems to think that the height is infact 2100m . I've personally been to the place and have verified it to be the truth from official records. Sad that I cannot quote any reference materials.
The article cited for chembra peak's height as 2000m is questionable. Its an outdated article with a probable typo and can be found in this link:http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/yw/2003/03/15/stories/2003031500900300.htm [Strangely the Wiki article is not referring to this as well.]
I understand that Wiki's policy says "Truth does not matter ... only verifiability does!" and now that Hindu article has published wrong information, Wiki seems to just continue with this.
Personally, I am not much familiar with Wiki and would like to check with the editor before suggesting / making modifications.chembra is 2050 m tall— Precedingunsigned comment added by2406:5600:16:B70B:50D8:EB15:7B10:D8CD (talk)18:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks,Sandeep—Precedingunsigned comment added byUsandeep (talk •contribs)04:44, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onChembra Peak. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)02:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]