Talk:Centre-right politics
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theCentre-right politics article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
Archives:1Auto-archiving period:3 years  |
 | This article was nominated fordeletion on 13 November 2009 (UTC). The result ofthe discussion waskeep. |
 | This article iswritten inBritish English withOxford spelling (colour,realize,organization,analyse; note that-ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms may be different or absent from othervarieties of English. According to therelevant style guide, this should not be changed withoutbroad consensus. |
 | Centre-right politics has been listed as one of theSocial sciences and society good articles under thegood article criteria. If you can improve it further,please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you canreassess it. Review: January 20, 2025. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is ratedGA-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Johnymin, I've challenged your edit to the lead. Could you justify why this wording is a better summary of the article's body if you're going to reinstate it?Thebiguglyalien (talk)01:57, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The antichavista coalition is left wing to centre right, is highly big tent, and they didn't regain power, they only have won a legislative election, annulled later by Maduro regime. The coalition is mainly liberal, centrist, you can't lie with the humanitarian crisis of the country. Acción democratica and Voluntad Popular are center lfert amd part of this coalition. No way it is center right, it is antichavista.Johnymin (talk)05:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Nominator:Thebiguglyalien (talk ·contribs)10:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewer:IntentionallyDense (talk·contribs)14:25, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'll review this shortly, politics isn't my usual area of interest so forgive me for any gaps in knowledge here.IntentionallyDense(Contribs)14:25, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1.Well-written: | ||
 | 1a. the prose is clear, concise, andunderstandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Some minor tweaks to prose have been suggested below.IntentionallyDense(Contribs)19:06, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] Prose is clear and understandable to even a politically naive person such as myself. Kudos to the nominator for their prose skills as I envy their ability to write such well put together sentences.IntentionallyDense(Contribs)02:52, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] |
| 1b. it complies with theManual of Style guidelines forlead sections,layout,words to watch,fiction, andlist incorporation. | Article complies with the necessary components of the MOS.IntentionallyDense(Contribs)19:06, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] |
| 2.Verifiable withno original research, as shown by asource spot-check: | ||
| 2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance withthe layout style guideline. | reflist exists.IntentionallyDense(Contribs)03:50, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] |
| 2b.reliable sources arecited inline. All content thatcould reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Because so many sources were used and some weren't open access I focused on the sources I could access without TWL as I was feeling too lazy to open it. I tried to take a look at the sfns from several sections. I found no issues with the sources. I spotchecked the following:[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].IntentionallyDense(Contribs)03:50, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] |
| 2c. it containsno original research. | IntentionallyDense(Contribs)03:50, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] |
| 2d. it contains nocopyright violations orplagiarism. | Everything was put into the authors own words. I have no concerns about plagiarism here.IntentionallyDense(Contribs)03:50, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] |
| 3.Broad in its coverage: | ||
| 3a. it addresses themain aspects of the topic. | There are some suggestions below where I feel additional detail could be helpful.IntentionallyDense(Contribs)19:06, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] Anywhere where I felt like there could be more information there were no sources to add such information. I feel that this article goes into an appropriate amount of detail.IntentionallyDense(Contribs)02:52, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] |
| 3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (seesummary style). | No unnecessary detail.IntentionallyDense(Contribs)19:06, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] |
| 4.Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Article is neutral.IntentionallyDense(Contribs)19:06, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] |
| 5.Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoingedit war or content dispute. | No obvious issues here.IntentionallyDense(Contribs)03:50, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] |
| 6.Illustrated, if possible, bymedia such asimages,video, oraudio: | ||
| 6a. media aretagged with theircopyright statuses, andvalid non-free use rationales are provided fornon-free content. | All images are properly tagged (there's even a FP in there).IntentionallyDense(Contribs)03:50, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] |
| 6b. media arerelevant to the topic, and havesuitable captions. | All pictures seem relevant and are appropriately captioned.IntentionallyDense(Contribs)03:50, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] |
| 7.Overall assessment. | On hold untilThebiguglyalien addresses my feedback.IntentionallyDense(Contribs)19:06, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] This article meets all GA criteria as outlined above. All of my feedback has been addressed. Great work!IntentionallyDense(Contribs)02:52, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] |
Christian democrats are more open to state intervention than conservativesis a bit unclear to me. I'm assuming you mean things like welfare or social programs? I tries to find an appropriate wikilink and foundInterventionism (politics) andMarket intervention but I'm not sure if those are appropriate here.IntentionallyDense(Contribs)04:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Political scientists disagree as to whether post-war Christian democracy is continuous with that of the 19th century,[12] and Christian democracy is sometimes regarded separately from the typical right-wing voter blocas I'm having a hard time understanding what you're trying to say here.IntentionallyDense(Contribs)04:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Centre-right parties support environmental preservation, though they are often seen as less interested in the subject than left-wing parties. The centre-right rejects concepts of climate grief or catastrophism, arguing that they can reduce interest in solving environmental issues.is a bit short for a stand-alone paragraph. I was wondering if there is more information about how the centre-right beliefs around environmental issues intersect with their beliefs regarding economics. Oftentimes when environmental issues are brought up there are conversations about what is more cost-effective or aligns more with parties' economic beliefs as well.IntentionallyDense(Contribs)03:34, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The European centre-right declined between 1931 and 1935 as the Great Depression set in.do sources suggest reasons as to why the Great Depression caused this decline?IntentionallyDense(Contribs)03:34, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
