Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Carols by Candlelight

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconAustralia:MelbourneMid‑importanceiconicon
WikiProject iconCarols by Candlelight is within the scope ofWikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage ofAustralia andAustralia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit theproject page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported byWikiProject Melbourne (assessed asMid-importance).
Note icon
Need help improving this article?Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at theNational Library of Australia.
Note icon
TheWikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email tohelp@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
WikiProject iconHolidays:ChristmasLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofholidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bythe Christmas task force (assessed asMid-importance).
WikiProject iconChristianity:ChristmasLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofChristianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported byChristmas task force (assessed asMid-importance).
On 1 January 2023, it was proposed that this article bemoved toCarols by Candlelight (Melbourne). The result ofthe discussion wasPropose split.

world?

[edit]

Where else is it held around the world? --Astrokey4412:52, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have reinstated that it has spread around the world. Prester John claimed in his edit comment that the linked article didn't say so, but it does, just not in those words. But what does "around the world" mean? It surely doesn't mean "to every country". So how many countries and where is needed for that statement to be correct? The linked article mentions "throughout Africa and New Zealand and in several of the South Pacific Islands", and "in the courtyard outside the Church Of The Holy Nativity in Bethlehem". To me, that is enough to qualify for the statement, although if someone wants tomodify the wording rather than delete it, I'm certainly open to other possibilities.Philip J. Rayment00:03, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well put. I think it justifies at least a mention.Nick carson (talk)13:01, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article title ambiguous

[edit]

THis article starts off talking about a tradition of singing carols etc, usually in a park, and then the remainder of the article is talking about Melbourne Carols. Thus I suggest either: Edit this page to make it about EITHER Melborne Carols OR Carols by Candlelight in general,OR: Re-name this article Melbourne Carols By Candlelight.Sem boy (talk)22:28, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carols by Candlelightis Melbourne's Carols by Candlelight. It has since spread around Australia and to certain corners of the world. I have modified the lead somewhat to reflect the encompassing nature of the article better.Nick carson (talk)12:59, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Earlier start

[edit]

That the carols started in the 1800s in Moonta is questionable. I note that it was primarilyadded by an anonymous IP who made only that one edit. The only reference I could find with a bit of quick Googling ishere, which says:

Some claim the practice originated here in the mid 19th Century among the Cornish and staunchly Methodist copper miners of Moonta in South Australia.

Tallow candles or ”fat jacks” were stuck to the front of their hats with a daub of wet clay. The shift captains turned a blind eye as the men took time out of their Christmas eve shifts to gather on the mine platforms and sing by the light of the fat jacks and again the next day with the women in church.

Modern carols by candlelight began in 1938 as radio broadcasts, and by 1970 they were on television.

This does givesome support to the claim, but doesn't say that the Moonta practice "spread through Victoria andMelbourne", nor that Norman Banks merely popularised it. Rather, it seems that the Cornish miners in Moonta did something that was vaguely similar to the modern Carols by Candlelight, but their practice has no real connection to want Banks started.Philip J. Rayment (talk)13:13, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3KZ or 3LO?

[edit]

'The tradition spread through Victoria and Melbourne until it was popularised in 1938 by Norman Banks, a radio announcer then with Melbourne radio station 3KZ. Whilst walking home from his night-time radio shift on Christmas Eve in 1937'TheAustralian Broadcasting Corporation claim that it was 3LO's Dot Dawson (wife ofSmoky Dawson) who proposed Carols by Candlelight in Melbourne while she was working at the ABC. Norman Banks had moved to 3LO by this time.—Precedingunsigned comment added byBebofpenge (talkcontribs)06:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Criticism" Information"

[edit]

The information in this section is terribly bias and frankly unsubstantiated. "...families wishing to attend must pay up to $400" Family tickets similar to Carols in the Domain cost $100, not $400. "[Carols in the Domain] is seen as more greatly reflecting the spirit of Christmas" All the proceeds made at Carols by Candlelight go to Vision Australia, how is that not reflecting the spirit of christmas? "Carols by Candlelight's cast consistently pales in comparison to that of Carols in the Domain... and organisers fail to attract significant international headliners" Pales? Thats pathetic. "Given that families are required to pay in order to attend, this has damaged the reputation of the event" Well clearly it hasn't seeing as though tickets always sell out, and it is the most watched Carols event in Australia. Anyone else think that this information should be removed?-WikiXiki—Precedingunsigned comment added byWikiXiki (talkcontribs)09:45, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,I have just modified 2 external links onCarols by Candlelight. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue orfailed to let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)03:22, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Size of events?

[edit]

The lead paragraph talks about the "largest event" in Australia, but has no actual numbers or definition. Later, for Geelong, there's an assertion about the "third largest". What figures are used for this? In terms of live audience, Melbourne gets about 10,000 according to newspaper reports - and I think the Myer Music Bowl has limits. Does it include TV figures? In that case it's not a useful comparison with live-only events, which seem to be able to attract more than 10,000.— Precedingunsigned comment added byMusic3149 (talkcontribs)06:44, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See also - Christmas music from Australia

[edit]
TitleComposer / LyricistYear publishedNotes
Hymn for Christmas DayJohn Howson1840sComposed for Saint James Church[1]
Christmas Present PolkaJohn Howson1852[2]
All my heart this night rejoicesCharles Edward Horsley1862[3]
Hymn for Christmas-DayJames Johnson1862
Our Australian Christmas SongErnesto Spagnoletti1863[4]
Christmas In AustraliaGeorge Tolhurst1864Lyrics celebrate southern hemisphere summer christmas
Victorian Christmas WaltzCesare Cutolo1866Cite error:There are<ref> tags on this page without content in them (see thehelp page).
Song Of The AngelsCharles Sandys Packer1883
Oh, lovely voices of the skyAlfred Pumpton1890
Star of The EastAugustus Juncker1890[5]
While all things were in quiet silenceHenry John King1899
In The CathedralGeorge Savin De Chaneet1900Cite error:There are<ref> tags on this page without content in them (see thehelp page).
My Little Christmas BelleJoe Slater and Ward McAllister1910[6]
Australian Christmas CarolJoseph Summers1908Captures the sound of St Georges Perth Cathedral Bells
Christmas AnthemPaolo Giorza1870
Yuletide GavotteJohn Albert Delaney1900
Nine CarolsArthur Rivers1904[7]
Star Of The East 1910August Juncker1910
The Christmas story in carolsRivers, Arthur Richard 1857-19401912[8]
Bush Christmas CarolJessie Penfold1912Western Australian
A Christmas HymnJoseph Furphy (Tom Collins) & Arthur Chanter1914[9]
The Night Of Fear Is OverFritz Hart1929
Hurrah For Father ChristmasChristian Hellerman1952

—Precedingunsigned comment added byTradimus (talkcontribs)13:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^https://soundcloud.com/sydlivmus/first-hymn-for-christmas-day
  2. ^Howson, John, 1819?-1871 (1852),The Christmas present polka / composed by J. Howson, J. Howson{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  3. ^Horsley, Charles Edward, 1822-1876,All my heart this night rejoices [music] : Christmas hymn / composed by Charles Edward Horsley, C.E. Horsley{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  4. ^Spagnoletti, Ernesto (1863),Our Australian Christmas song, Alonzo Grocott, retrieved17 September 2019
  5. ^Juncker, Aug. W. (August W.); Rogers, W. R. Russell (1890),Star of the East, A.W. Juncker?, retrieved17 September 2019
  6. ^http://nla.gov.au/nla.mus-vn3426213
  7. ^Rivers, A. R. (Arthur Richard), 1857-1940 (1904),Nine Christmas carols / by Arthur R. Rivers, s.n.], retrieved20 September 2019{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  8. ^Rivers, A. R. (Arthur Richard) (1912),The Christmas story in carols, H. J. Diddams & Co, retrieved17 September 2019
  9. ^http://handle.slv.vic.gov.au/10381/151994

Requested move 1 January 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider amove review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was:Propose split. The nominator has requested that this is closed, and a split is proposed instead. As there appears to be support for this idea, I am closing the requested move early.(closed by non-admin page mover)echidnaLives -talk -edits05:24, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Carols by CandlelightCarols by Candlelight (Melbourne)Carols by Candlelight (Melbourne) – There are numerous "Carols by Candlelight" events, and some articles link to these general events, e.g.Christmas music andTemplate:Christmas. I think we need an article for these general events, with the starting point being the content inCarols_by_Candlelight#Other_carols_events. And if we do create such an article, think it is self-evident that it would be theWP:PRIMARYTOPIC forCarols by Candlelight, and therefore this article needs to be renamed.Adpete (talk)05:28, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, looking more closely, perhaps a request for a split (Wikipedia:Proposed article splits) is more appropriate? But I still think the basic idea is right, i.e. moving the Melbourne event toCarols by Candlelight (Melbourne).Adpete (talk)06:02, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would agree to that. Right now the article is trying to be two things at once.HiLo48 (talk)03:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Splitting sounds like a good idea, but should it be split into:
  • ...Melbourne and ...other, or
  • ...Vision Australia and ...other, or
  • ...Australia and ...other
  • something else?
Is there some reason why the Melbourne one is deserving of its own article (with Melbourne in the name)? Are the Perth, Adelaide, Canberra, Darwin, and (non-Melbourne) Victorian "Carols by Candlelight" substantially different things?Mitch Ames (talk)04:11, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Melbourne is where it all began.HiLo48 (talk)04:18, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The main reason is that the Melbourne one gets more coverage - both it and the Sydney one are broadcast on prime time TV - and there are plenty of sources on it. In other words, it passesWP:GNG. The Sydney one has its own article atCarols in the Domain, so to me, that means the Melbourne one gets its own article too, as the two events are comparable in terms of who's on and media coverage. If someone wants to make articles on the Adelaide / Brisbane / Perth events they're welcome to, but I think sources will be harder to come by. So I say: one article for the tradition (which can include a list of major ones, as the section in this article does), and one for the Melbourne event.Adpete (talk)04:24, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposed split

[edit]

This article covers two distinct topics: (section 1) the annual Melbourne event called "Carols by Candlelight"; and (section 2) the general tradition and practice of "Carols by Candlelight" events (including the list of the larger ones around the world). I think a split is appropriate for a few reasons: they are distinct topics, and incoming links refer to specifically one or the other. The Sydney event, which is roughly comparable in terms of TV coverage and celebrities appearing, has its own page atCarols in the Domain; so that suggests that the Melbourne event is also significant enough to have its own article. And two other editors expressed in-principle support in the previous section.

The harder problem is what to call the two articles. I think it is best to haveCarols by Candlelight for the tradition, andCarols by Candlelight (Melbourne) for the Melbourne concert; in other words I think that the tradition is the primary topic. My reasons:

Anyway, I'm calling for feedback on (a) whether to do the split, and (b) how to do the split (i.e. is some other naming of articles better). I will list this atWikipedia:Proposed article splits.Adpete (talk)04:08, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a "proposed split" tag to the article now.Adpete (talk)07:52, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If most people outside Victoria think of "Carols by Candlelight" when they think of the general event, not the one on TV, that seems like a good enough reason to support your proposal. But is it a problem covering both topics in the same article?Javan009 (talk)23:37, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – there doesn't seem to be any issue with having both topics in the same article, information about the tradition currently makes up a small proportion of current article, with most information about events outside of Melbourne being in their own articles already if notable.Happily888 (talk)15:00, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Carols_by_Candlelight&oldid=1206552955"
Categories:
Hidden category:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp