Talk:Birmingham–Peterborough line
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
According to this[1] a new station 'Coleshill Parksway' is to open on the line later this year. Worth mentioning somewhere.G-Man*22:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can anyone explain why the line elements do not join up as they do atnl:Wikipedia:Spoorlijnsjablonen – and can this be fixed? --Picapica13:21, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So they do, I now see (on my home computer – earlier I was looking at the page at work). Strange, though, about the difference in the display between en: and nl: when using the same browser with the same settings. Thanks for your answer, anyway. --Picapica18:46, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Is the comprehensive list of stations served (complete with OS grid references) necessary in the body of the text, given that it duplicates almost entirely the information already available in the line diagram infobox at top right? --Picapica16:11, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
EricITOworld (talk)11:57, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Since the line diagram has been nested in the infobox it breaks the line diagram by introducing spaces into the line. We either need to fix this or not to nest the line diagrams in the infobox. Probably a general problem rather than specifically related to this article. Any thoughts.Keith D (talk)22:15, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
the only stock that regually uses the whole line is class 170s all the others listed justy use the line between wigston north junction and syston. Should they be moved?— Precedingunsigned comment added by86.181.77.135 (talk)18:02, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link onBirmingham to Peterborough Line. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If necessary, add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online13:49, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links onBirmingham to Peterborough Line. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{dead link}} tag tohttp://www.eadt.co.uk/content/eadt/news/story.aspx?brand=EADOnline&category=News&tBrand=EADOnline&tCategory=xDefault&itemid=IPED05%20Feb%202010%2009%3A56%3A31%3A940When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue orfailed to let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)04:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This from the article needs an update: "The work, detailed in the Network Rail Freight Route Utilisation Strategy, should be completed by 2014." And this needs clarification: "In February 2010 Network Rail confirmed that it would ... perform work to increase capacity between Ely–Peterborough line..." Is it 'to increase capacity between here and the Ely–Peterborough line' or 'to increase capacity on the Ely–Peterborough line'? -Lopifalko (talk)07:18, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]