Thecontentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates topost-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a contentious topic.
The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours (except inlimited circumstances)
This article must adhere to thebiographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced orpoorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentiallylibellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue tothis noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please seethis help page.
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited tojoin the project andcontribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to theUnited States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theU.S. state ofNew York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofpolitics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of theMilitary history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see alist of open tasks. To use this banner, please see thefull instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofInternational relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theUniversity of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofveganism andvegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism
You are justifying creating the section based on Clinton's birthday message to Epstein and not more broad details related to their relationship. I don't mind the section being created, but I do hold an objection to it being created based on the justification of a simple birthday message Clinton sent. As there is also already a standalone article about their relationship, the section would have to be much smaller too, perhaps the size of the onein the Donald Trump article.MyGosh789 (talk)22:40, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It also shouldn't exclude how their relationship was set up likely through Ghislaine Maxwell, with Virginia Giuffre even later stating that Ghislaine Maxwell "loved to talk about how easily she could get former President Bill Clinton on the phone"-a hint that she arranged meetings between Epstein and Clinton, which Maxwell even alleged in August 2025 that she would do during the times Clinton and Epstein met-[2][3] and also how "she and Epstein had visited the White House together when Clinton was in office."[4] Maxwell has claimed that Clinton "was my friend, not Epstein's friend."[5]MyGosh789 (talk)23:07, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think it would be a good idea to have the info box show a portrait for the second term since we have second term portraits for Obama and Trump in their articles. I've written to the Clinton library to see which one of the pictures on Commons is the second term portrait and will replace once I get more details if everyone agrees.~2025-40234-37 (talk)22:18, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Why does it say Clinton was joint most popular president leaving Office when everyone knows he was the most popular president of all times when leaving Office ? Clinton had 66. % approval rating, Reagan had 63 % approval rating.~2026-20807-1 (talk)19:53, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,Why is this page protected from editing in light of the Epstein files? Either unlock the page for editing, or do the editing yourself. Then you can go back to claiming that Wikipedia is not biased~2025-35113-26 (talk)19:35, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh they are up in arms,.there's a separate dedicated article for trump-epstein bromance and there's a lot and actively updated and it is linked to main Trump article~2025-42070-64 (talk)01:45, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If anyone has a serious suggestion to improve the article, you can propose a specific edit supported byreliable sources. If you want to play victim and complain about how biased we are, while making shit up that suits your narrative, we won't engage further and you'd probably find Conservapedia to be more to your liking. – Muboshgu (talk)14:58, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes Clinton was most popular president of all times leaving Office not koknt most popular. Clinton had 66 % approval ratings leaving Office while Reagan had 63 % approval rating.~2026-20807-1 (talk)19:56, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Moving this content into a spinoff article is valid, but why is it so buried in this article? The only link there is a bluelink under the words “a relationship” and easily missed. It seems to me that a link to that article should be in the hatnote for that section.Peter G Werner (talk)17:10, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Clinton had the highest approval ratings leaving Office of all presidents with 66 % making him the most popular president of all times. Ronald Reagan was second with 63 %. This is very documented so saying joint most popular president is completely wrong and should be removed and say the president with highest approval ratings of all times instead~2026-20807-1 (talk)19:59, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Where are you getting your numbers?
In the article, in the "Public Opinion" section, we are saying that Clinton's approval rating was 68%. We are getting that figure from a poll published by CBS News. That poll says that Clinton and Reagan both had 68%.
level-5 vital article is ratedGA-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
.svg)
