This article was nominated fordeletion on 11 March 2007. The result ofthe discussion waskeep.

This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Brands This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofbrands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands ??? This article has not yet received a rating on theproject's importance scale. CompaniesLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcompanies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests :Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess :Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit :Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox :Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain :Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located atCategory:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the{{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the{{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answerrequests for comments Fashion This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofFashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion ??? This article has not yet received a rating on theproject's importance scale.

Should there really be links to outside Aveda salons at the bottom of the page? For the vast majority of readers, these are completely useless.

Yes, because it can give more insight into different level salons and prices. That's why it is important to have external links to Aveda salons.

Saying that external links are useless is a little overboard. If the reader wanted to find out more information about these products or services offered by various salons, they could use this page.

No, they would use Aveda's official website. We aren't an advertisement, as has been pointed out to you numerous times.Vaguely06:54, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No kidding, I think we've established that you've told me, that post was a little old to be commenting on; go find another page to haunt, if you don't want to aid in the rewrite of this one.—Precedingunsigned comment added by64.246.144.52 (talk) 00:04, August 25, 2007 (UTC)

I've deleted alot of the text that was added only because it was not neutral. If there is anything else that should be deleted, please point it out SPECIFICALLY, not by saying the whole article is a problem. It reads a little better now.—The precedingunsigned comment was added by64.246.144.52 (talk)21:38, 25 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I deleted some of the external links, such as ones that point out specific salons in newspaper articles, and I also deleted links to specific salons. I was originally all for keeping specific links to show the difference between Experience, Concept, and Lifestyle, but now I think it is best to only allow the Aveda.com link, where you can find any type of salon you like. This way, this article doesn't turn into an advertisement between companies. Please tell me if there is anything else that needs immediate fixing. Thank you!—The precedingunsigned comment was added by64.246.144.52 (talk)17:02, 16 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I really don't feel that the Advertisement Label is appropriate any longer. And if it is, would somebody PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY. I have been working on this article for a few months now, and I am getting sick of seeing the advertisement label at the top. Either MARK the spots that seem as an advertisement or SPECIFY THEM HERE.

Thanks.—The precedingunsigned comment was added byMaytrixInk (talk •contribs)16:07, 26 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links onAveda. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20140414170856/http://www.bdsmovement.net/2009/usacbi-top-ten-brands-to-boycott-this-christmas-601 tohttp://www.bdsmovement.net/2009/usacbi-top-ten-brands-to-boycott-this-christmas-601
• Corrected formatting/usage forhttp://www.brandweek.com/bw/news/recent_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003674448

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue orfailed to let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)11:02, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Start-Class Brands articles
• Unknown-importance Brands articles
• WikiProject Brands articles
• Start-Class company articles
• Low-importance company articles
• WikiProject Companies articles
• Start-Class fashion articles
• Unknown-importance fashion articles